Re: 8201 - Clarify required and optional operations

One way a service instance could support MEX w/out supporting 
GetMetadata is if it defines metadata resource endpoints for which a 
wst:Get returns a mex:Metadata element.

- gp

On 12/2/2009 2:20 AM, Doug Davis wrote:
>
> Hmmm, that's an interesting point.  If an endpoint doesn't support 
> GetMetadata then in what way would they be MEX compliant?  I guess 
> someone could claim that the endpoint might not support GetMetadata 
> but still uses the mex:Metadata wrappers in places - like in EPRs it 
> generates.
>
> thanks
> -Doug
> ______________________________________________________
> STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
> (919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
> The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
>
>
> *David Snelling <David.Snelling@uk.fujitsu.com>*
>
> 12/01/2009 11:13 AM
>
> 	
> To
> 	Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
> cc
> 	Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>, 
> "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
> Subject
> 	Re: 8201 - Clarify required and optional operations
>
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
>
> Doug,
>
> Look fine except:
>
> On 30 Nov 2009, at 14:45, Doug Davis wrote:
>
> WS-MEX:
> GetMetadata     Optional
>
> Seems strange to support a spec, but not implement it.
>
> Take care:
>
>     Dr. David Snelling < David . Snelling . UK . Fujitsu . com >
>     Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited
>     Hayes Park Central
>     Hayes End Road
>     Hayes, Middlesex  UB4 8FE
>     Reg. No. 4153469
>
>     +44-7590-293439 (Mobile)
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited
> Hayes Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE
> Registered No. 4153469
>
> This e-mail and any attachments are for the sole use of addressee(s) and
> may contain information which is privileged and confidential. Unauthorised
> use or copying for disclosure is strictly prohibited. The fact that this
> e-mail has been scanned by Trendmicro Interscan and McAfee Groupshield 
> does
> not guarantee that it has not been intercepted or amended nor that it is
> virus-free.
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 20:58:27 UTC