Thursday, 31 December 2009
- RE: [Bug 8293] New: fuzzy definition of a "metadata resource"
- RE: [Bug 8176] New: Eventing: MAY vs MUST on UnkownSubscription fault
- RE: 8283 discussion
- RE: AI 131 - BP requirements that apply to WS-RA's reference to WSDL 1.1
Tuesday, 29 December 2009
Tuesday, 22 December 2009
- Re: AI 131 - BP requirements that apply to WS-RA's reference to WSDL 1.1
- RE: AI 131 - BP requirements that apply to WS-RA's reference to WSDL 1.1
- Re: Bug 6463: Attaching Policy to WS-Mex GetMetadata - Marked up proposal
Monday, 21 December 2009
Friday, 18 December 2009
- Re: Bug 6463: Attaching Policy to WS-Mex GetMetadata - Marked up proposal
- Re: 8283 discussion
- Re: Bug 6463: Attaching Policy to WS-Mex GetMetadata - Marked up proposal
- Re: AI 129 - concrete proposal for issue 8292 (fwd)
Thursday, 17 December 2009
Wednesday, 16 December 2009
- Re: 8201 - please review
- Re: 8192 discussion
- AW: context node for XPath filter dialect ambiguous?
- Re: context node for XPath filter dialect ambiguous?
Tuesday, 15 December 2009
- Re: 8201 - please review
- Re: 8201 - please review
- RE: Bug 6463: Attaching Policy to WS-Mex GetMetadata - Marked up proposal
- Re: 8201 - please review
- Progress on AI relating to 8176
- 8293 discussion
- 8283 discussion
- 8192 discussion
- 8157 discussion
- Agenda WS-RA 2009-12-15
- Issues status for today's WG meeting
- RE: issue 8200: new proposal
- RE: [Bug 8205] New: MEX: can mex appear more than once in an EPR
- Re: Bug 6463: Attaching Policy to WS-Mex GetMetadata - Marked up proposal
- Re: Bug 6463: Attaching Policy to WS-Mex GetMetadata - Marked up proposal
- RE: [Bug 8205] New: MEX: can mex appear more than once in an EPR
- RE: Bug 6463: Attaching Policy to WS-Mex GetMetadata - Marked up proposal
- Re: Bug 6463: Attaching Policy to WS-Mex GetMetadata - Marked up proposal
- RE: [Bug 8205] New: MEX: can mex appear more than once in an EPR
- RE: [Bug 8205] New: MEX: can mex appear more than once in an EPR
- RE: [Bug 8205] New: MEX: can mex appear more than once in an EPR
- RE: [Bug 8202] New: MEX: definition of GetMetata/Dialect is a bit off
Monday, 14 December 2009
- RE: [Bug 8202] New: MEX: definition of GetMetata/Dialect is a bit off
- RE: Issue 8164: proposal
- RE: issue 8200: new proposal
- RE: Issue 8164: proposal
- Re: Bug 6463: Attaching Policy to WS-Mex GetMetadata - Marked up proposal
- RE: Bug 6463: Attaching Policy to WS-Mex GetMetadata - Marked up proposal
- RE: [Bug 8302] New: descriptions of PutResponse and CreateResponse contain unclear sections
- RE: [Bug 8202] New: MEX: definition of GetMetata/Dialect is a bit off
- RE: issue 8200: new proposal
Saturday, 12 December 2009
Friday, 11 December 2009
Thursday, 10 December 2009
- RE: issue 8200: new proposal
- RE: Issue 8164: proposal
- Re: AW: Issue 8323 - resolution
- RE: issue 8200: new proposal
- RE: Issue 8164: proposal
Wednesday, 9 December 2009
- RE: issue 8200: new proposal
- RE: Issue 8164: proposal
- RE: issue 8200: new proposal
- AW: Issue 8323 - resolution
- Issue 8303
- Minutes from 2009-12-08 have been posted
- Issue 8164: proposal
- Issue 8164: proposal
- Issue 8284 - clarification from gil...
- Issue 8323 - resolution
- issue 8200: new proposal
- transfer spec missing wsdl
Tuesday, 8 December 2009
- Agenda WSRA 2009-12-08 corrected due to previously resolved issue being removed from the list
- Agenda, WS-RA 2009-12-08
- Notes for WS-RA WG meeting on December 8, 2009
- RE: new snapshots
- RE: context node for XPath filter dialect ambiguous?
Monday, 7 December 2009
- RE: context node for XPath filter dialect ambiguous?
- RE: 8201 - please review
- Bug 6463: Attaching Policy to WS-Mex GetMetadata - Marked up proposal
- RE: 8201 - please review
Thursday, 3 December 2009
Wednesday, 2 December 2009
Tuesday, 1 December 2009
- Re: 8201 - Clarify required and optional operations
- Re: Agenda: WS-RA 2009-12-01
- Re: Agenda: WS-RA 2009-12-01
- RE: Agenda: WS-RA 2009-12-01
- AW: context node for XPath filter dialect ambiguous?
- Agenda: WS-RA 2009-12-01
- Re: 8201 - Clarify required and optional operations
- Re: 8201 - Clarify required and optional operations