- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 04:58:50 +0000
- To: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9608
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dug@us.ibm.com
--- Comment #3 from Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> 2010-05-12 04:58:50 ---
To add to Tom's comment, after a discussion within the WG, the WG
believes that the number of potential items in the enumeration, while
interesting, isn't nearly as valuable as the total size of the
enumeration (total byte count of the data, not just the # of items).
This would allow for better pre-allocation of resources than simply
knowing the number of items. However, since calculating the total
size of the entire enumerated data set could be very expensive, the
cost of doing this at Enumerate() time didn't seem to be worth the
additional cost.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 04:58:51 UTC