- From: Doug Davis via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:40:43 +0000
- To: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
Update of /w3ccvs/WWW/2002/ws/ra/edcopies
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv3921
Modified Files:
wsfrag.xml
Log Message:
bad wording found by Ram
Index: wsfrag.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /w3ccvs/WWW/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/wsfrag.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.58
retrieving revision 1.59
diff -u -d -r1.58 -r1.59
--- wsfrag.xml 10 Mar 2010 05:39:39 -0000 1.58
+++ wsfrag.xml 16 Mar 2010 19:40:41 -0000 1.59
@@ -923,16 +923,14 @@
</p>
<p>
This Mode value has the net effect of doing a "delete" on the
- referenced fragment, followed by an "insert" on the fragment's
- parent. If the referenced fragment is already absent then
- the "insert" operation is still performed.
+ referenced fragment, followed by an "insert" on the fragment's
+ parent.
</p>
<p>
- If the Value element is not present then this Mode MUST simply remove
- the referenced fragment. If the fragment is already absent, or if
- the Expression evaluates to an empty fragment, then this operation
- MUST have no effect. If the implementation is schema aware
- and it detects that the Expression is not valid per the schema then a
+ If the fragment is absent, or if the Expression evaluates to an
+ empty fragment, then the "delete" portion of the operation MUST
+ have no effect. If the implementation is schema aware
+ and it detects that the Expression is not valid per the schema then a
wsf:InvalidExpression fault MUST be generated.
</p>
<p>
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2010 19:40:44 UTC