- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:05:08 +0000
- To: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8283
Summary: fault descriptions/semantics are inconsistent
Product: WS-Resource Access
Version: PR
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Eventing
AssignedTo: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
ReportedBy: gilbert.pilz@oracle.com
QAContact: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
WS-Eventing defines a number of faults in Section 6. Most of these faults are
described by text with the pattern "This fault is generated when . . .". Two of
these faults (EmptyFilter and UnusableEPR) are described by text with the
pattern "This fault MAY be generated when . . ."
1.) Why do some descriptions use the RFC 2119 "MAY" and others do not?
2.) Since the term "generated" means "do something internal and OPTIONALLY
transmit the fault", the phrase "MAY be generated" is redundant.
Proposal: Change the descriptions of the faults to use the pattern "This fault
MUST be generated when . . ."
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
Received on Friday, 13 November 2009 20:05:09 UTC