- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:05:08 +0000
- To: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8283 Summary: fault descriptions/semantics are inconsistent Product: WS-Resource Access Version: PR Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Eventing AssignedTo: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org ReportedBy: gilbert.pilz@oracle.com QAContact: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org WS-Eventing defines a number of faults in Section 6. Most of these faults are described by text with the pattern "This fault is generated when . . .". Two of these faults (EmptyFilter and UnusableEPR) are described by text with the pattern "This fault MAY be generated when . . ." 1.) Why do some descriptions use the RFC 2119 "MAY" and others do not? 2.) Since the term "generated" means "do something internal and OPTIONALLY transmit the fault", the phrase "MAY be generated" is redundant. Proposal: Change the descriptions of the faults to use the pattern "This fault MUST be generated when . . ." -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Received on Friday, 13 November 2009 20:05:09 UTC