W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org > November 2009

[Bug 8192] New: Fragment: when is InvalidFragment fault generated?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:09:13 +0000
To: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-8192-2780@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8192

           Summary: Fragment: when is InvalidFragment fault generated?
           Product: WS-Resource Access
           Version: FPWD
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Fragment
        AssignedTo: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
        ReportedBy: dug@us.ibm.com
         QAContact: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org


Put says:
--
[Body]/wst:Put/wsf:Fragment
    This element contains an expression that identifies the location of a
fragment in the resource and a value for the fragment. If the contents of this
element are invalid a wsf:InvalidFragment fault MUST be generated. 
--

Its not clear to me when this fault would be generated.  In the definition
of each subelement we define faults for when the data in them is bad, so
we need to explain when this higher level fault would be generated or
(if never) then just remove it.

As it stands, someone may read this (and the other faults) and think that
either one can be generated - which of course is an interop problem.

Proposal:
remove the last sentence and the InvalidFragment fault.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2009 23:09:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:06:36 UTC