- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:24:55 +0000
- To: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6694 --- Comment #4 from David Snelling <david.Snelling@UK.Fujitsu.com> 2009-08-28 07:24:55 --- Asir, Doug, and Dave have come up with the following language. It is less proscriptive than my last pass, but makes it clear what implicit ops are and how that affects what people see. "An endpoint MAY indicate that it supports WS-Eventing, or any of its features, by including the WS-Eventing Policy assertion(s) within its WSDL. By doing so the endpoint is indicating that the corresponding WS-Eventing operations will be supported by that endpoint since they will not appear in the WSDL. " Clearly the spec name needs to be changed for different specs. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 28 August 2009 07:25:05 UTC