- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:41:41 +0000
- To: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6803 Summary: RT: Is this functionality required? Product: WS-Resource Access Version: FPWD Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ResourceTransfer AssignedTo: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org ReportedBy: geoffbu@microsoft.com QAContact: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org Based on recent WG discussions, it is now unclear if the functionality mentioned below is required for RT or if it should be removed. 1)RT 3.2.1 QName Dialect 2)RT 3.2.2 XPath 1.0 Dialect 3)RT Put/Fragment/@Mode 4)RT 4. Faults a)ConcurrencyFault b)InvalidExpressionFault (re-named as 'InvalidExpression') c)GetFault d)ResourceValidityFault e)FragmentAlreadyExistsFault f)PutFault g)PutModeUnsupportedFault h)CreateFault i)InvalidMetadataFault j)MultipartExceededFault k)InvalidPutSyntaxFault 5)Appendix II Resource Metadata Content 6)Appendix II.A Lifecycle metadata 7)Appendix II.B Expression Dialect Metadata Proposal: Remove functionality from RT specification. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 23:41:50 UTC