- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:41:41 +0000
- To: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6803
Summary: RT: Is this functionality required?
Product: WS-Resource Access
Version: FPWD
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ResourceTransfer
AssignedTo: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
ReportedBy: geoffbu@microsoft.com
QAContact: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
Based on recent WG discussions, it is now unclear if the functionality
mentioned below is required for RT or if it should be removed.
1)RT 3.2.1 QName Dialect
2)RT 3.2.2 XPath 1.0 Dialect
3)RT Put/Fragment/@Mode
4)RT 4. Faults
a)ConcurrencyFault
b)InvalidExpressionFault (re-named as 'InvalidExpression')
c)GetFault
d)ResourceValidityFault
e)FragmentAlreadyExistsFault
f)PutFault
g)PutModeUnsupportedFault
h)CreateFault
i)InvalidMetadataFault
j)MultipartExceededFault
k)InvalidPutSyntaxFault
5)Appendix II Resource Metadata Content
6)Appendix II.A Lifecycle metadata
7)Appendix II.B Expression Dialect Metadata
Proposal: Remove functionality from RT specification.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 23:41:50 UTC