Re: Fw: WS-MetadataExchange conversion

All,
  there was an error in the xsl - I've updated it - see: 
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/
I've already checked in what I believe is the competed RT - all that's 
missing is the 'status' text (I hope).

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com



Katy Warr <katy_warr@uk.ibm.com> 
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-editors-request@w3.org
01/27/2009 08:30 AM

To
public-ws-resource-access-editors@w3.org
cc

Subject
Fw: WS-MetadataExchange conversion







All, 
Doug says he's ok to do Enum, I can do Transfer (assuming Ashok ok with 
Mex). 
Is that ok with folk? 
Thanks 
Katy 

----- Forwarded by Katy Warr/UK/IBM on 27/01/2009 13:28 ----- 
From: 
Katy Warr/UK/IBM@IBMGB 
To: 
ashok.malhotra@oracle.com 
Cc: 
public-ws-resource-access-editors@w3.org 
Date: 
27/01/2009 13:21 
Subject: 
Fw: WS-MetadataExchange conversion





Hi Ashok 
Apologies, I forgot you said your preference was WS-Mex .  I've made a 
start that I could send you if it's any use to you, or are you already 
done?   
Thanks, 
Katy 



----- Forwarded by Katy Warr/UK/IBM on 27/01/2009 13:14 ----- 
From: 
Katy Warr/UK/IBM@IBMGB 
To: 
public-ws-resource-access-editors@w3.org 
Date: 
27/01/2009 12:01 
Subject: 
WS-MetadataExchange conversion






Hi  All 

I reckon the best way for me to understand this is to have a go converting 
a doc based on Doug's.  I'll start converting ws-mex today (just so you 
know so we don't all convert the same one :o) )  I've not got cvs access 
yet but will post file to list when I'm done. 

Cheers, 
Katy 
From: 
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> 
To: 
public-ws-resource-access-editors@w3.org 
Date: 
27/01/2009 04:05 
Subject: 
wsrt-wd1.xml







All, 
I've figured out how to modify the xsl so that examples and tables are 
numbered and then <specref>'s can be used to explicitly say "Example 2-1" 
- what do people think? should I update our xsl for this or should we 
limit ourself to just the generic xsl?  For RT it makes it annoying not 
being able to refer to an example or table that's far far away since 
relative terms like "above" don't really work well. 

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com 

__________________ 

All, 
I've checked in the latest wsrt-wd1.xml and attached it to this note for 
those who do not have cvs access yet. 
This one conforms to the dtd but I still need to go thru it line by line 
to make sure everything is right. 
Some things I couldn't figure out and would appreciate some help - if 
someone else knows how to do it: 
- how do I make something bold - <b> isn't allowed 
- other specs use <specref>'s to examples and tables, but our xls doesn't 
support it - should we? 
- as a result of the previous one I had to modify all references to say 
"as shown below..." instead of "in table X'. 
- <example>/<eg>  (or just <eg>) appears to be the only way to include 
preformatted text (like code) that will respect line-breaks.  However, if 
I give the example a <head> then it says "Example:" and there are time 
when its not an example.  Anyone know of any other tag I could use? 

thanks 
-Doug 





Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU 










Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU 











Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU 

Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 14:27:50 UTC