- From: Stephan Poehlsen <poehlsen@itm.uni-luebeck.de>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:29:57 +0200
- To: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- CC: public-ws-resource-access-comments@w3.org
Doug, In an earlier version of WS-Eventing Appendix A there was a long part http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-ws-eventing-20100330/#id35822170 After removing this part I thought that the EventDescriptions should not appear anymore in MetadataSections. Maybe it is possible in WS-Event-Descriptions Section 4.1.1 to express more clearly, that the EventSource Policy and the MetadataSection are two different things, otherwise the solution with the MetadataSection might get lost when skimming over the spec. So what about the NotificationWSDLs? From the current editor's WS-Eventing spec, it is not clear for me that the NotificationWSDL is retrievable via a MetadataSection. Especially since in section A.2.1 http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-ws-eventing-20100330/#id35822333 the gray box and Section A.3 was removed. Regards, Stephan Doug Davis wrote: > > Stephan, > see: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10376 > would the proposal address your concern? > > To your 2nd point... if you are starting with the Event Source WSDL then > yes you need to use ws-policy to embed the EVD data in it. > Of course, you could also just query the event source directly asking > for the EVD data - using MEX.getMetadata( "wsevd:EventDescriptions" ); > and by-pass ws-policy all together. > > thanks > -Doug
Received on Tuesday, 17 August 2010 06:31:41 UTC