Re: WS-Resource-Access FPWG

Thank you, Noah (and TAG)
-bob

On Apr 23, 2009, at 5:59 PM, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:

> Bob,
>
> The TAG discussed your note (attached) on its teleconference of 9  
> April
> 2009 [1].  At this time, the TAG does not anticipating raising issues
> against WS-Resource-Access relating to the matters discussed in your  
> note.
> Thank you.
>
> Noah
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Mar/0143.html
>
> --------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn
> IBM Corporation
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> 1-617-693-4036
> --------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
> Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org
> 03/23/2009 04:27 PM
>
>        To:     www-tag@w3.org
>        cc:     public-ws-resource-access-comments@w3.org, (bcc: Noah
> Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
>        Subject:        WS-Resource-Access FPWG
>
>
> Dear TAG
> The WS-Resource-Access working group, on 2009-03-17 published the FPWD
> of five specifications and has begun public review:
> WS-Transfer[1]
> WS-Resource-Transfer[2]
> WS-Eventing[3]
> WS-Enumeration[4]
> WS-Metadata-Exchange[5]
>
> Emails to all known groups in several organizations that may have an
> interest in these specifications will be sent in the near future.
>
> Prior to the start of the WS-Resource-Access working group, a TAG
> resolution[6] was published expressing concerns about several details
> of some of these specifications, especially WS-Transfer.   Since the
> WG is now under way, and on a tight nominal schedule, it would benefit
> all involved if issues that might arise from your review were to be
> created earlier rather than later.  It is my hope that all issues that
> might be raised against fundamental aspects of any of these
> specifications be created before Last Call if at all possible.
> To that end, would the TAG please respond with specific issues of
> concern that in the opinion of the TAG need to be resolved in these
> specifications at its earliest convenience.
> In any case, a response with issues, or a statement of no-issues would
> be appreciated.
>
> thanks
> Bob Freund
> Chair, WS-Resource-Access Working Group
>
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-transfer-20090317/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-resource-transfer-20090317/
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-eventing-20090317/
> [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-enumeration-20090317/
> [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-metadata-exchange-20090317/
> [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Nov/0008.html
>
>
>
>