- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:24:41 +0900 (JST)
- To: "Frederick Hirsch" <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: public-ws-policy@w3.org, "W3C WS-Policy Editors" <public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org>
> > Thanks Felix > > So if we simply wish to update the Primer Note itself, which might be > simpler and clearer, is that a slow difficult process or simple and > fast? step 1: prepare the draft (you have done that?) step 2: make a publication request (I would do that) It really depends on what the WG wants to do. Felix > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch > Nokia > > > > On Nov 22, 2008, at 12:34 AM, ext Felix Sasaki wrote: > >> Felix Sasaki さんは書きました: >>> >>> Hello Frederick, >>> >>> just FYI: >>> >>> Frederick Hirsch さんは書きました: >>>> Attached are an update to the Framework Errata document, and a new >>>> Primer Errata document. >>>> >>>> This message is requesting the chairs and WG for formal WG >>>> approval of these documents and publication. >>>> >>>> Once approved they can be checked into CVS [1]. This will update >>>> the content referenced from the Framework Recommendation [2] to >>>> the Framework Errata, making the Framework errata visible. >>>> >>>> The Primer Note does not have a link to the errata. I recommend >>>> that the WS-Policy WG home page [3] be updated with a link to the >>>> Errata document for the Primer. >>> >>> From the W3C process you can have an errata document only for >>> Recommendations. However, if the WG is fine to maintain a document >>> like what your propose, that's fine. You just have to be aware of >>> the informal status of that document. >>> >>>> >>>> Separately I ask whether we might also update the note to include >>>> a link to the primer errata document. >>> >>> I'm not sure if that is OK - to publish a WG Note with a link to an >>> errata document. I'll check and come back to you. >> >> I checked, it's OK to publish a new version of the Note that links >> to the errata >> document. Meanwhile, if there are primer errata, you may take the >> opportunity to integrate them. >> >> >> Felix >> >>> >>> Felix >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks to Asir for reviewing drafts of the errata documents. >>>> >>>> regards, Frederick >>>> >>>> Frederick Hirsch >>>> Nokia >>>> >>>> [1] they would both be checked into the directory WWW/2002/ws/ >>>> policy/7 in /w3ccvs >>>> >>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/ >>>> >>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/ , Add errata link next to >>>> entry in bullet list for primer >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> W3C <http://www.w3.org/> >>>> >>>> >>>> Web Services Policy 1.5 - Framework Errata >>>> >>>> >>>> 21 November 2008 >>>> >>>> Latest version: >>>> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/7/framework-errata.html Editors: >>>> Asir S Vedamuthu, Microsoft Corporation >>>> David Orchard, BEA Systems, Inc. >>>> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia >>>> Maryann Hondo, IBM Corporation >>>> Prasad Yendluri, webMethods (A subsidiary of Software AG) >>>> Toufic Boubez, Layer 7 Technologies >>>> �mit Yal�inalp, SAP AG. >>>> >>>> Last modified: $Date: 2007/09/25 03:43:31 $ >>>> >>>> Copyright <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr- >>>> notice#Copyright> (�) 2007 W3C <http://www.w3.org/>^� (MIT <http://www.csail.mit.ed >>>> u/>, ERCIM <http://www.ercim.org/>, Keio <http://www.keio.ac.jp/ >>>> >), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability >>>> <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Legal_Disclaimer >>>> >, trademark >>>> <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#W3C_Trademarks >>>> > and document use >>>> <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-documents >>>> > rules apply. >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> Abstract >>>> >>>> This document records all known errors in the Web Services Policy >>>> 1.5 - Framework <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/ >>>> > specification; for updates see the latest version of that >>>> document. >>>> >>>> The errata are numbered, classified as Substantive <#substantive> >>>> or Editorial <#editorial>, and listed in reverse chronological >>>> order of their date of publication in each category. >>>> >>>> Each entry has the following information: >>>> >>>> * A unique entry number >>>> * The date it was added to the errata page. >>>> * The section referred to. >>>> * A description of the problem and correction if applicable. >>>> Changes to the text of the spec are indicated thus: deleted >>>> text, new text, modified text . >>>> * A rationale for making the change (not required for editorial >>>> errata). >>>> >>>> Changes to the text of the specification are indicated thus: new, >>>> added text, modified text, and deleted text. Substantive >>>> corrections are proposed by the Web Services Policy Working Group >>>> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/ >>>> > (part of the Web Services Activity <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ >>>> >), which has consensus that they are appropriate; they are not to >>>> be considered normative until approved by a Call for Review of >>>> Proposed Corrections >>>> <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/tr.html#cfr-corrections >>>> > or a Call for Review of an Edited Recommendation >>>> <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/tr.html#cfr-edited >>>> >. >>>> >>>> The Working Group is tracking all comments via Bugzilla >>>> <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=WS-Policy&component=Framework&component=Framework%2BAttachment&component=Framework%2BAttachment%2BGuidelines&component=Framework%2BAttachment%2BPrimer >>>> > and highly prefers to receive comments via this system. If >>>> access to Bugzilla is not feasible, you may send your comments to >>>> the mailing list public-ws-policy-comments@w3.org >>>> <mailto:public-ws-policy-comments@w3.org >>>> > mailing list (public archive >>>> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy-comments/ >>>> >). Each Bugzilla entry and email message should contain only one >>>> comment. All comments on this specification should be made >>>> following the Description for Issues >>>> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/#issues >>>> > of the Working Group. It will be very helpful if you include the >>>> string [WS-Policy-errata] in the subject line of your comment. >>>> >>>> >>>> Status of this Document >>>> >>>> This document records all known errors in the Web Services Policy >>>> 1.5 - Framework <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/ >>>> > specification; that were known at the time of publication of >>>> this document. >>>> >>>> None of the errata reported in this document have been approved by >>>> a Call for Review of Proposed Corrections or a Call for Review of >>>> an Edited Recommendation. As a consequence, they must not be >>>> considered to be normative. >>>> >>>> >>>> Table of Contents >>>> >>>> 1 Substantive Errata <#substantive> >>>> 2 Editorial Errata <#editorial> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> 1 Substantive Errata >>>> >>>> No substantive errata at present >>>> >>>> >>>> 2 Editorial Errata >>>> >>>> >>>> E01 >>>> >>>> Date Added: 2008-11-21 >>>> >>>> Summary: Note on using xml:id should reference Canonical XML 1.1 >>>> and XML Signature, Second Edition. References should be updated. >>>> >>>> >>>> Section *4.2, Policy Identification* >>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#Policy_Identification >>>> > >>>> >>>> 1. >>>> >>>> Replace the text of the second Note >>>> >>>> *Note:* >>>> Canonical XML 1.1 [C14N11 >>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#C14N11>] >>>> is intended to address the issues that occur with Canonical >>>> XML 1.0 with regards to xml:id. The W3C XML Security >>>> Specifications Maintenance WG has been chartered to address >>>> how to integrate Canonical XML 1.1 with XML Security, >>>> including XML Signature [SecSpecMaintWG >>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#SecSpecMaintWG >>>> >] >>>> (See http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/.) >>>> with the following text: >>>> >>>> *Note:* >>>> Note that is acceptable to sign a policy expression >>>> identified using xml:id with XML SIgnature (Second Edition) >>>> [XML-Signature-2ndEdition] and Canonical XML 1.1 [C14N11], >>>> as these recommendations address issues related to the use >>>> of xml:id and xml:base. >>>> where XML-Signature-2ndEdition is a link to a new reference >>>> added to the document. >>>> >>>> >>>> Appendix *B.2 Other References* >>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#Informative-References >>>> > >>>> >>>> 1. >>>> >>>> Update the reference to C14N11, as follows: >>>> >>>> Canonical XML 1.1, J. Boyer and G. Marcy Authors. W3C >>>> Candidate Recommendation, 21 June 2007. This is a work in >>>> progress. This version is available at >>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-xml-c14n11-20070621.2 May >>>> 2008. >>>> This version is available at >>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-c14n11-20080502. The >>>> latest version of Canonical XML 1.1 is available at >>>> http://www.w3.org/TR//xml-c14n11/. >>>> 2. >>>> >>>> Add a reference to XML Signature (Second Edition) after the >>>> reference to [XMLSignature]: >>>> >>>> [XML-Signature-2ndEdition] XML Signature Syntax and >>>> Processing, D. Eastlake, J. Reagle, D. Solo, F. Hirsch, and >>>> T. Roessler Editors. W3C Recommendation, 10 June 2008. This >>>> version of the XML Signature Syntax and Processing >>>> Recommendation is >>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xmldsig-core-20080610/. The >>>> latest version of XML-Signature Syntax and Processing is >>>> available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/. >>>> XML-Signature-2ndEdition is a link target. Note the removal of >>>> the hyphen in the title of the Second Edition. >>>> >>>> 3. >>>> >>>> Remove reference to XML Security Specifications Maintenance >>>> Working Group, [SecSpecMaintWG], as the text that referenced it >>>> has been removed as part of E01: >>>> >>>> [SecSpecMaintWG] XML Security Specifications Maintenance >>>> Working Group , See http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec. >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> W3C <http://www.w3.org/> >>>> >>>> >>>> Web Services Policy 1.5 - Primer Errata >>>> >>>> >>>> 21 November 2008 >>>> >>>> Latest version: >>>> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/7/primer-errata.html Editors: >>>> Asir S Vedamuthu, Microsoft Corporation >>>> David Orchard, BEA Systems, Inc. >>>> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia >>>> Maryann Hondo, IBM Corporation >>>> Prasad Yendluri, webMethods (A subsidiary of Software AG) >>>> Toufic Boubez, Layer 7 Technologies >>>> �mit Yal�inalp, SAP AG. >>>> >>>> Last modified: $Date: 2007/09/25 03:43:31 $ >>>> >>>> Copyright <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr- >>>> notice#Copyright> (�) 2007 W3C <http://www.w3.org/>^� (MIT <http://www.csail.mit.ed >>>> u/>, ERCIM <http://www.ercim.org/>, Keio <http://www.keio.ac.jp/ >>>> >), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability >>>> <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Legal_Disclaimer >>>> >, trademark >>>> <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#W3C_Trademarks >>>> > and document use >>>> <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-documents >>>> > rules apply. >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> Abstract >>>> >>>> This document records all known errors in the Web Services Policy >>>> 1.5 - Primer >>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-ws-policy-primer-20071112/ >>>> > Working Group Note ; for updates see the latest version of that >>>> document. >>>> >>>> The errata are numbered, classified as Substantive <#substantive> >>>> or Editorial <#editorial>, and listed in reverse chronological >>>> order of their date of publication in each category. >>>> >>>> Each entry has the following information: >>>> >>>> * A unique entry number >>>> * The date it was added to the errata page. >>>> * The section referred to. >>>> * A description of the problem and correction if applicable. >>>> Changes to the text of the spec are indicated thus: deleted >>>> text, new text, modified text . >>>> * A rationale for making the change (not required for editorial >>>> errata). >>>> >>>> Changes to the text of the specification are indicated thus: new, >>>> added text, modified text, and deleted text. >>>> >>>> The Working Group is tracking all comments via Bugzilla >>>> <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=WS-Policy&component=Framework&component=Framework%2BAttachment&component=Framework%2BAttachment%2BGuidelines&component=Framework%2BAttachment%2BPrimer >>>> > and highly prefers to receive comments via this system. If >>>> access to Bugzilla is not feasible, you may send your comments to >>>> the mailing list public-ws-policy-comments@w3.org >>>> <mailto:public-ws-policy-comments@w3.org >>>> > mailing list (public archive >>>> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy-comments/ >>>> >). Each Bugzilla entry and email message should contain only one >>>> comment. All comments on this specification should be made >>>> following the Description for Issues >>>> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/#issues >>>> > of the Working Group. It will be very helpful if you include the >>>> string [WS-Policy-errata] in the subject line of your comment. >>>> >>>> >>>> Status of this Document >>>> >>>> This document records all known errors in the Web Services Policy >>>> 1.5 - Primer >>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-ws-policy-primer-20071112/ >>>> > Working Group Note that were known at the time of publication of >>>> this document. >>>> >>>> >>>> Table of Contents >>>> >>>> 1 Substantive Errata <#substantive> >>>> 2 Editorial Errata <#editorial> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> 1 Substantive Errata >>>> >>>> No substantive errata at present >>>> >>>> >>>> 2 Editorial Errata >>>> >>>> >>>> E01 >>>> >>>> Date Added: 2008-11-21 >>>> >>>> Summary: Note on using xml:id should reference Canonical XML 1.1 >>>> and XML Signature, Second Edition. References should be updated. >>>> >>>> >>>> Section *2.10 Referencing Policy Expressions* >>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-ws-policy-primer-20071112/#Referencing_Policy_Expressions >>>> > >>>> >>>> 1. >>>> >>>> Replace the text of the Note >>>> >>>> *Note:* >>>> Canonical XML 1.1 [C14N11 >>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#C14N11>] >>>> is intended to address the issues that occur with Canonical >>>> XML 1.0 with regards to xml:id. The W3C XML Security >>>> Specifications Maintenance WG has been chartered to address >>>> how to integrate Canonical XML 1.1 with XML Security, >>>> including XML Signature [SecSpecMaintWG >>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#SecSpecMaintWG >>>> >] >>>> (See http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/.) >>>> with the following text: >>>> >>>> *Note:* >>>> Note that is acceptable to sign a policy expression >>>> identified using xml:id with XML SIgnature (Second Edition) >>>> [XML-Signature-2ndEdition] and Canonical XML 1.1 [C14N11], >>>> as these recommendations address issues related to the use >>>> of xml:id and xml:base. >>>> where XML-Signature-2ndEdition is a link to a new reference >>>> added to the document. >>>> >>>> >>>> Appendix *C References* >>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-ws-policy-primer-20071112/#references >>>> > >>>> >>>> 1. >>>> >>>> Update the reference to C14N11, as follows: >>>> >>>> Canonical XML 1.1, J. Boyer and G. Marcy Authors. W3C >>>> Candidate Recommendation, 21 June 2007. This is a work in >>>> progress. This version is available at >>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-xml-c14n11-20070621.2 May >>>> 2008. >>>> This version is available at >>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-c14n11-20080502. The >>>> latest version of Canonical XML 1.1 is available at >>>> http://www.w3.org/TR//xml-c14n11/. >>>> 2. >>>> >>>> Add a reference to XML Signature (Second Edition) after the >>>> reference to [C14N11]: >>>> >>>> [XML-Signature-2ndEdition] XML Signature Syntax and >>>> Processing, D. Eastlake, J. Reagle, D. Solo, F. Hirsch, and >>>> T. Roessler Editors. W3C Recommendation, 10 June 2008. This >>>> version of the XML Signature Syntax and Processing >>>> Recommendation is >>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xmldsig-core-20080610/. The >>>> latest version of XML-Signature Syntax and Processing is >>>> available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/. >>>> XML-Signature-2ndEdition is a link target. Note the removal of >>>> the hyphen in the title of the Second Edition. >>>> >>>> 3. >>>> >>>> Remove reference to XML Security Specifications Maintenance >>>> Working Group, [SecSpecMaintWG], as the text that referenced it >>>> has been removed as part of E01: >>>> >>>> [SecSpecMaintWG] XML Security Specifications Maintenance >>>> Working Group , See http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > >
Received on Sunday, 23 November 2008 02:25:19 UTC