- From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:05:53 -0800
- To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- CC: public-ws-policy@w3.org, Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>, Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>, Christopher Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
+1 All the best, Ashok Frederick Hirsch wrote: > > I would like to request that the WS-Policy WG formally agree to the > following decisions: > > 1) That we update the WS-Policy Primer Note [1] with the changes noted > in the Issue noted below and which I raised on the public mailing list > 5 September. > > I propose that we simply update the Working Group Note. Does the WG > agree? > > 2) That we issue an errata against the WS-Policy Framework > Recommendation with the changes noted below and raised 5 September. > > I propose adding this material to the errata document for the > Framework Recommendation. Note that the Recommendation already > contains a link to the errata document [3], so this material should be > visible to readers of the Recommendation once that errata document is > updated. > Does the WG agree? > > 3) We could also update the Recommendation to reflect the change but I > do not recommend this. > > Given that the document already includes a link to the errata, it > would not add much and would require additional review process. > > Please note that since I raised this issue on 5 September [4] and the > chairs noted that this is editorial (I agree) and can be dealt with by > email on 16 September [5]. Since there has been no email discussion, I > take it that proposals #1 and #2 are approved by the WG? > > Please indicate any objection on the WG list by the 17 November so the > editorial team can make the changes in a timely manner and the > publication can be completed before the moratorium in December. > > Thanks > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch > Nokia > > Publishing deadline information > 18 December, 12pm ET: Deadline for publication requests before moratorium > 22 December: Last publications before moratorium > 23 December - 1 January: No publications 2 January 2009: > Publications resume > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-ws-policy-primer-20071112/ > > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/ > > [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/7/framework-errata.html > > [4] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2008Sep/0000.html > > [5] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2008Sep/0001.html > > On Sep 5, 2008, at 11:48 AM, Frederick Hirsch wrote: > >> I have recorded two new issues in Bugzilla against the Framework and >> Primer Recommendations - proposed errata. >> In both cases this includes correction of a note related to C14N11, >> addition of a reference for XML Signature (Second Edition), >> correction of the C14N11 reference and removal of [SecSpecMaintWG] >> reference. >> >> >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6029 >> >> Summary: Note on using xml:id should reference Canonical XML >> 1.1 >> and XML Signature, Second Edition >> Product: WS-Policy >> Version: PR >> Platform: Macintosh >> URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy- >> 20070904/#Policy_Identification >> OS/Version: MacOS X >> Status: NEW >> Severity: normal >> Priority: P1 >> Component: Framework >> AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org >> ReportedBy: frederick.hirsch@nokia.com >> QAContact: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org >> >> >> Title - Note on using xml:id should reference Canonical XML 1.1 and XML >> Signature, Second Edition >> >> Description/Justification >> >> Currently section 4.2, Policy Identification contains a note that use of >> Canonical XML 1.0 with xml:id is not appropriate. This is correct. >> >> It has an additional Note that Canonical XML 1.1 is intended to >> address this >> and that the XML Security Specifications Maintenance WG has been >> chartered to >> investigate. This is no longer accurate since Canonical XML 11 has been >> released as a Recommendation as has XML Signature (Second Edition). >> >> Target - framework >> >> Proposal >> >> Create Proposed Errata against Framework document. >> >> (Part 1) Replace the following text in section 4.2, Policy >> Identification: >> --- >> Note: >> Canonical XML 1.1 [C14N11] is intended to address the issues that >> occur with >> Canonical XML 1.0 with regards to xml:id. The W3C XML Security >> Specifications >> Maintenance WG has been chartered to address how to integrate >> Canonical XML 1.1 >> with XML Security, including XML Signature [SecSpecMaintWG] (See >> http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/.) >> --- >> With the following text: >> --- >> Note that is is acceptable to sign a policy expression identified >> using xml:id >> with XML SIgnature (Second Edition) [XML-Signature-2ndEdition] and >> Canonical >> XML 1.1 [C14N11], as these recommendations address issues related to >> the use >> of xml:id and xml:base. >> --- >> (Part 2) >> Update the reference to C14N11 in Appendix B.2. >> >> Replace the following: >> --- >> Canonical XML 1.1, J. Boyer and G. Marcy Authors. W3C Candidate >> Recommendation, 21 June 2007. This is a work in progress. This >> version is >> available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-xml-c14n11-20070621. The >> latest >> version of Canonical XML 1.1 is available at >> http://www.w3.org/TR//xml-c14n11/. >> --- >> with >> >> Canonical XML 1.1, J. Boyer and G. Marcy Authors. W3C Recommendation, >> 2 May >> 2008. This version is available at >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-c14n11-20080502. The latest version of >> Canonical XML 1.1 is available at http://www.w3.org/TR//xml-c14n11/. >> >> --- >> >> (Part 3) >> Add a reference to Appendix B.2 for XML Signature (Second Edition) >> after the >> reference to [XMLSignature]: >> ---- >> [XML-Signature-2ndEdition] XML Signature Syntax and Processing, D. >> Eastlake, J. >> Reagle, D. Solo, F. Hirsch, and T. Roessler Editors. W3C >> Recommendation, 10 >> June 2008. This version of the XML Signature Syntax and Processing >> Recommendation is >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xmldsig-core-20080610/. The >> latest version of XML-Signature Syntax and Processing is available at >> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/. >> ---- >> (note removal of hyphen in title in Second Edition) >> >> --- >> (Part 4) Remove [SecSpecMaintWG] reference. >> --- >> >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6030 >> >> Summary: Note on using xml:id should reference Canonical XML >> 1.1 >> and XML Signature, Second Edition >> Product: WS-Policy >> Version: PR >> Platform: Macintosh >> URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-ws-policy-primer- >> 20071112/#Referencing_Policy_Expressions >> OS/Version: MacOS X >> Status: NEW >> Severity: normal >> Priority: P2 >> Component: Primer >> AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org >> ReportedBy: frederick.hirsch@nokia.com >> QAContact: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org >> >> >> Section 2.10 Referencing Policy Expressions after example 2.16 has >> same issue >> as framework, note needs to be replaced. >> >> Description/Justification >> >> Currently Section 2.10 Referencing Policy Expressions after example 2.16 >> contains a note that use of >> Canonical XML 1.0 with xml:id is not appropriate. This is correct. >> >> It has an additional Note that Canonical XML 1.1 is intended to >> address this >> and that the XML Security Specifications Maintenance WG has been >> chartered to >> investigate. This is no longer accurate since Canonical XML 11 has been >> released as a Recommendation as has XML Signature (Second Edition). >> >> Target - primer >> >> Proposal >> >> Create Proposed Errata against Primer document. >> >> (Part 1) Replace the following text in Section 2.10 Referencing Policy >> Expressions after example 2.16: >> --- >> Note: >> Canonical XML 1.1 [C14N11] is intended to address the issues that >> occur with >> Canonical XML 1.0 with regards to xml:id. The W3C XML Security >> Specifications >> Maintenance WG has been chartered to address how to integrate >> Canonical XML 1.1 >> with XML Security, including XML Signature [SecSpecMaintWG] (See >> http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/.) >> --- >> With the following text: >> --- >> Note that is is acceptable to sign a policy expression identified >> using xml:id >> with XML SIgnature (Second Edition) [XML-Signature-2ndEdition] and >> Canonical >> XML 1.1 [C14N11], as these recommendations address issues related to >> the use >> of xml:id and xml:base. >> --- >> (Part 2) >> Update the reference to C14N11 in Appendix C. >> >> Replace the following: >> --- >> Canonical XML 1.1, J. Boyer and G. Marcy Authors. W3C Candidate >> Recommendation, 21 June 2007. This is a work in progress. This >> version is >> available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-xml-c14n11-20070621. The >> latest >> version of Canonical XML 1.1 is available at >> http://www.w3.org/TR//xml-c14n11/. >> --- >> with >> >> Canonical XML 1.1, J. Boyer and G. Marcy Authors. W3C Recommendation, >> 2 May >> 2008. This version is available at >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-c14n11-20080502. The latest version of >> Canonical XML 1.1 is available at http://www.w3.org/TR//xml-c14n11/. >> >> --- >> >> (Part 3) >> Add a reference to Appendix C for XML Signature (Second Edition) : >> ---- >> [XML-Signature-2ndEdition] XML Signature Syntax and Processing, D. >> Eastlake, J. >> Reagle, D. Solo, F. Hirsch, and T. Roessler Editors. W3C >> Recommendation, 10 >> June 2008. This version of the XML Signature Syntax and Processing >> Recommendation is >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xmldsig-core-20080610/. The >> latest version of XML-Signature Syntax and Processing is available at >> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/. >> ---- >> (note removal of hyphen in title in Second Edition) >> >> --- >> (Part 4) Remove [SecSpecMaintWG] reference. >> ---- >> >> >> regards, Frederick >> >> Frederick Hirsch >> Nokia >> >> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2008 17:06:49 UTC