- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:49:57 +0900
- To: Maryann Hondo <mhondo@us.ibm.com>
- CC: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Hi Maryann, some minor change proposals: 1) "Assertion authors should specify the semantics of multiple instances of same policy assertion type in the same policy alternative and the semantics of parameters and nested policy (if any) when there are multiple instances of a policy assertion type in the same policy alternative regardless of the mechanism used to attach them to a policy subject." add a sentence: "If there are multiple instances of a policy assertion type in the same policy alternative without parameters and nested policies, these have the same meaning as a single assertion of the type within the policy alternative." (to take sec. 3.2 of the framework into account) 2) "Assertion Authors that utilize WSDL policy subjects need to understand how the assertions will be processed in merging and the specify implications of a result where multiple assertions of the assertion type in an alternative, in the merged policy. " to "Assertion Authors that utilize WSDL policy subjects need to understand how the assertions will be processed in merging and the specific implications of a result where multiple assertions of the assertion type are in an alternative, in the merged policy." Felix Maryann Hondo wrote: > > This is the current proposed strawman for section 5.7 of the > Guidelines document and a diff to the current > working draft at [ > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-guidelines.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 > ] > > > Maryann > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2007 05:50:07 UTC