Chris This is very good. I have one suggestion regarding the following proposed text "The approach taken by WS-RM Policy [Web Services Reliable Messaging Policy Assertion] was to provide for their assertion to be attached at either or both message and endpoint policy subjects, and to require the use of endpoint policy subject when message policy subject is used. " If I understand it, perhaps it would be clearer to state "The approach taken by WS-RM Policy [Web Services Reliable Messaging Policy Assertion] is to provide for an RM assertion to be attached at either or both message and endpoint policy subjects. In order to eliminate the ambiguity associated with only using an message policy subject, the WS-RM Policy requires a policy to be attached to an endpoint policy subject as well as a message policy subject whenever a policy is attached to a message policy subject. " regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Oct 24, 2007, at 11:14 AM, ext Christopher B Ferris wrote: > > Sorry I couldn't get this out sooner, I had travel woes and then > connectivity issues in my hotel room > > > > Cheers, > > Christopher Ferris > STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy > email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com > blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris > phone: +1 508 234 2986 > <guidelines-5.6-proposal.doc>
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 17:32:56 UTC