- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:35:32 -0400
- To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 15:37:08 UTC
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5218 If there are multiple instances of a policy assertion type in the same policy alternative that have, if present, compatible nested policies and the policy assertion authors have not specified the semantics of repetition of policy assertions of that type then that repetition is simply redundancy, and the multiple assertions of that type within a policy alternative have the same meaning as a single assertion of the type within the policy alternative. Rationale: IMO, it matters none whether the assertion type can carry parameters and/or nested policy. The key is that any nested policy present on the multiple assertions is compatible. Cheers, Christopher Ferris STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris phone: +1 508 234 2986
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 15:37:08 UTC