- From: Monica J. Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:05:43 -0700
- To: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: tom@coastin.com, Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
> Christopher B Ferris wrote: Tom, > Please see my responses below. > Cheers, mm1: Chris, perhaps more elaboration is required to tie this together (which seems to be Tom's point). That text ties Section 3.4 and 4.5 together, and could also provide a reference back to Section 3.4. Thanks. > > > 1. Use of only one policy alternative (not a mixture of several, just > > one) in explicit text. > > Could we add something like th following to your existing text?: > > * [add] AN ENTITY can engage the behaviors of a compatible policy > > alternative > > when the policy alternative is part of the intersection result. > Although > > more than > > one policy alternative may exist in an intersection result, only one > policy > > alternative of all the expected behaviors is engaged. > Well, clearly, I think that this is a given. Quoting from section 3.4 [1] > "A requester MAY choose any alternative since each is a valid > configuration for interaction with the service, > but a requester MUST choose only a single alternative for an > interaction with a service since each represents > an alternative configuration. "
Received on Monday, 21 May 2007 19:05:52 UTC