- From: Monica J. Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 17:26:49 -0700
- To: Daniel Roth <Daniel.Roth@microsoft.com>
- Cc: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>, Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Daniel Roth wrote: >>AIN Closed flavour: Any assertion not in an alternative should not be applied (revised chris proposal) >> >> > >Chris' revised proposal doesn't say anything about the absence of assertions. It simply says that no behaviors are to be applied for the alternative other than the behaviors specified by the assertions in the alternative. > >Daniel Roth > > Asir, Again, we are all struggling if there is a difference here and if so what it actually is. A behavior is specified by a policy assertion. (your words=>) The behavior specified the assertions is not applied. Again how does this differ from the status quo we have today? Thanks.
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2007 00:26:13 UTC