- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 18:03:45 -0400
- To: ws policy <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
- Cc: Hirsch Frederick <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Is it correct to say: 1. Client has access to its own policy, the provider policy and the result of intersection which it performed 2. Result of intersection is a policy in its own right, and has no implicit meaning other than what is stated in that policy (with its own vocabulary) HOWEVER 3. Client can interpret that result-of-intersection policy together with provider policy to infer acceptable interactions with provider, based on vocabulary present in provider policy. Thus the policy that results from intersection itself does not say negation, but it can be inferred from that policy taken in conjunction with provider policy. Is this an approach toward making this less confusing? Thanks regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2007 22:03:53 UTC