- From: Monica J. Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 16:50:18 -0700
- To: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Chris,
For:
"...Instead, we could simply state that the behavior implied by an
assertion that is absent from a given alternative is not to be
applied in the context of the attached policy subject when that
alternative is engaged...."
>>Monica: Can you perhaps explain how this is different that the text we have now to alleviate the confusion that exists?
1. The text is descriptive text rather than RFC language.
2. Does it seem more accurate to say that the policy assertions that
exist in a given alternative are applied in the context of the
attached policy subject when that alternative is engaged?
3. What effect does this have on a domain's capability to restrict or
not restrict that this statement (or provide semantics around it)?
Related to 2.
I am posing questions rather than pushback or position.
Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2007 23:49:44 UTC