- From: Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>
- Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:20:37 -0500
- To: Katy Warr <katy_warr@uk.ibm.com>
- Cc: WS-Addressing <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, ws policy <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Well that case can still be handled by having two or more nested alternatitves. Remember the alternatives are for responses not requests. Each reply to and fault to is a separate response. However, I still in more in favor of alternative D) to delete the nested policy assertions for Addressing assertion Tom Katy Warr wrote: > > Tom > We have discussed scenarios in previous wsa meetings where a client > may need to mix anon/non-anon on a single request: > - e.g. replyTo=anon, faultTo=nonAnon > As wsam:AnonymousResponses and wsam:NonAnonymousResponses are > contradictory requirements, there does not appear to be a way for a > service indicate that it could accept this combination on a single > request (as these assertions specify a single hard requirement which > applies to both replyTo and faultTo). > regards, > Katy > > > > *Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>* > Sent by: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org > > 02/03/2007 20:36 > Please respond to > tom@coastin.com > > > > To > WS-Addressing <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, ws policy > <public-ws-policy@w3.org> > cc > > Subject > Corrected Proposed Alternative A for resolution of ws addr metadata > LC comment > > > > > > > > > > I never posted a complete change proposal for Alternative A (which > defines the nested assertions of Addressing assertion as requirements, > with absence implying Prohibition. > > I post this for completeness. > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------- > Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com > Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133 > > > [attachment "ws-AddrMetadataPolicyEdits-altA.pdf" deleted by Katy > Warr/UK/IBM] > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > / > / > > /Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with > number 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 > 3AU/ > > > > > > -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
Received on Sunday, 4 March 2007 22:20:55 UTC