- From: Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 15:09:55 -0500
- To: WS-Addressing <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, ws policy <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 2 March 2007 20:10:39 UTC
Attached is a PDF file which shows changes for Proposed alternative C to resolve ws-addr metadata LC comment. This proposal defines the nested policy assertion types for Addressing assertion as requirements on sending responses from the subject attached to. However, no statement is made on the meaning of a the nested assertions not being present in an alternative. I changed the exampe headings, and removed the example which put both nested assertions in an alternative, since this is meaningless given they mutually exclusive requirements. -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
Received on Friday, 2 March 2007 20:10:39 UTC