Comment on: NEW ISSUE 4654-- Guidelines for Policy Attachment

>Maryann Hondo wrote: Following up on my AI to open multiple bugs relative to this diff document....
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jun/0033.html
>
>I opened this one for the item......Guidelines for Policy Attachment
>        http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4654
>
To followup and refine my point in last week's call related to Best 
Practice 24 in Section 5.7. I'd suggest two editorial revisions that 
will make the Best Practice clearer. See earlier in Section 5.7:

    * Change from: "This is illustrative of how the assertion author can
      specify additional constraints and assumptions for attachment and
      engagement of behavior. Such additional constraints must be
      clearly specified by the assertion authors."
    * Change to: "This is illustrative of how the domain assertion
      author can specify additional constraints and assumptions for
      attachment and engagement of behavior in addition to the
      capabilities specified in WS-PolicyAttachment [link]. Such
      additional constraints must be clearly specified by the assertion
      authors."

And, with the specification Best Practice 24 to support emphasis of 
point above:

    * Change from: "If an assertion can be attached at multiple points
      within a policy subject, an assertion author should specify a
      preferred attachment point for the chosen policy subject."
    * Change to: "If an assertion can be attached at multiple points
      within a policy subject, an assertion author should specify a
      preferred attachment point for the chosen policy subject within
      their domain specification."

Thank you.

Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 16:35:41 UTC