Following on, here are my comments relative to Issue 4663 [1] that have already been posted [2]. Thank you. Comment: In Section 8.1, be specific to what WS-Addressing wsam:addressing indicates in two instances. * Comment [1] o Change from: "The “parent” assertion indicates that both forms of responses are supported." o Change to: "The “parent” assertion indicates that WS-Addressing is supported without qualification." * Comment [2] o Change from: "Within the specification it was possible for implementers to chose whether they supported anonymous responses or non-anonymous responses in the context of a message exchange patterns." o Change to: "Within the specification it was possible for implementers to chose whether they supported anonymous responses or non-anonymous responses in the context of a message exchange patterns, or whether WS-Addressing is supported without qualification." [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4663 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jun/0069.htmlReceived on Friday, 22 June 2007 16:42:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:33:32 UTC