[Bug 4663] [Guidelines] Comments on Proposal Draft

• From: Monica J. Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
• Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:41:53 -0700
• To: "'mhondo@us.ibm.com'" <mhondo@us.ibm.com>
• Cc: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
• Message-id: <467BFBD1.1030307@sun.com>

Following on, here are my comments relative to Issue 4663 [1] that have 
already been posted [2]. Thank you.

Comment: In Section 8.1, be specific to what WS-Addressing 
wsam:addressing indicates in two instances.

    * Comment [1]
          o Change from: "The “parent” assertion indicates that both
            forms of responses are supported."
          o Change to: "The “parent” assertion indicates that
            WS-Addressing is supported without qualification."
    * Comment [2]
          o Change from: "Within the specification it was possible for
            implementers to chose whether they supported anonymous
            responses or non-anonymous responses in the context of a
            message exchange patterns."
          o Change to: "Within the specification it was possible for
            implementers to chose whether they supported anonymous
            responses or non-anonymous responses in the context of a
            message exchange patterns, or whether WS-Addressing is
            supported without qualification."

[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4663
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jun/0069.html

Received on Friday, 22 June 2007 16:42:01 UTC