- From: Monica J. Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:31:22 -0700
- To: "'mhondo@us.ibm.com'" <mhondo@us.ibm.com>, "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Following in the same stead as Asir, here are my comments relative to Issue 4662 [1] that have already been posted [2]. These serve as a correction to the cut-paste error [3]. Thank you. Comment: In Section 5.6.1, since the use of wsp:Optional is not directional, revise slightly. Reason: Both may specify policies.This proposed change is consistent with succeeding text early in Section 5.6.2. * Change from: "The provider may influence what is possible by choosing whether or not to include policy alternatives in a policy expression, by using the wsp:Optional attribute. * Change to: "The consumer or provider may influence what is possible by choosing whether or not to include policy alternatives in a policy expression, by using the wsp:Optional attribute. " [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4664 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jun/0069.html [3] (Cut paste error) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jun/0086.html [4] Reference: "Since optional behaviors indicate optionality for **both the provider and the consumer**, behaviors that must always be engaged by a consumer must not be marked as "optional" with a value "true" since this would allow the consumer to select the policy alternative that does not contain the assertion, and thus not engaging the behavior."
Received on Friday, 22 June 2007 16:30:19 UTC