- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:56:24 -0400
- To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF5608E12E.C6F160F9-ON8525731C.005C3BC5-8525731C.005CE4FA@us.ibm.com>
Related to the issue resolution to 4654 [1], the following questions need to be examined and proposals drafted: 1. How to make existing WSDL section more specific to just WSDL 2. Determine which existing BP in existing WSDL section should be made generic 3. Determine if the WSDL section should handle WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 separately 4. Determine if attachment terminology is used consistently in new General Guidelines section and the existing WSDL section 5. Determine if any other specific sections are required for other attachment possibilities like UDDI 6. Can the BP in the WSDL section (or new section) be linked back to the generic versions in the General Guidelines section? Paul and I would like to encourage WG members to sign up to these (or else we will assign AIs!) [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/07/18-ws-policy-irc#T09-34-40 Cheers, Christopher Ferris STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris phone: +1 508 234 2986
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:56:47 UTC