- From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:02:58 -0700
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>, "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Given the new info from Philippe [1], should the sentence in question be dropped? That is, s/The "application/wspolicy+xml" media type is being submitted to the IESG for review, approval, and registration with IANA.// [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jul/0014.html Regards, Asir S Vedamuthu Microsoft Corporation -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 6:07 AM To: public-ws-policy@w3.org Subject: [New Issue] Issue 4762: Media type section update Title: Media type section update Target: Framework, appendix A (first paragraph) Description: We need to update the media type section. We are now in step 5.2 of the media type registration process "IESG Approval" described in http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4288.txt . Proposal: replace The "application/wspolicy+xml" media type is being submitted to the IESG for review, approval, and registration with IANA. with The "application/wspolicy+xml" media type is being submitted to the IESG for approval and registration with IANA. Currently this is an CR issue. I don't regard this as critical for going to PR. If there is no time for handling this before the PR transition request, I'm fine with making it a PR issue. Felix
Received on Friday, 13 July 2007 19:04:50 UTC