public-ws-policy@w3.org from January 2007 by date

Wednesday, 31 January 2007

• RE: Bug 4270: Primer versioning example Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: NEW ISSUE (4072): [Guidance] Statements not relevant to assertion design Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: NEW ISSUE (4072): [Guidance] Statements not relevant to assertion design Asir Vedamuthu

Tuesday, 30 January 2007

• RE: Issue 3953 [Guidelines] Update to issue on domain interactions and assertion nesting Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: NEW ISSUE (4263) [Primer] Inform domain specific processing of ignorability of assertions Asir Vedamuthu
• [Primer] Proposal to close action 196 Frederick Hirsch
• [NEW ISSUE] Primer: Absence of Policy Assertions (editorial) [Issue 4288] Monica J. Martin
• ...[GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorable on an assertion (Issue Monica J. Martin

Monday, 29 January 2007

• RE: NEW ISSUE: [GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorab le o n the same assertion Prasad Yendluri
• Re: NEW ISSUE: [GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorab le o n the same assertion Sergey Beryozkin
• Agenda: WS-Policy WG telcon 25 - 2007-01-31 Paul Cotton

Thursday, 25 January 2007

• RE: Candidate CR Drafts Asir Vedamuthu
• Candidate CR Drafts Asir Vedamuthu

Wednesday, 24 January 2007

• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer Felix Sasaki

Tuesday, 23 January 2007

• Re: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG (WS Policy issue 4188) Joel Farrell
• Bug 4270: Primer versioning example David Orchard
• RE: policy scenarios and test cases Asir Vedamuthu

Monday, 22 January 2007

• RE: WS-Addressing comments relating to WS-Policy LC Paul Cotton
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: policy scenarios and test cases Prasad Yendluri
• policy scenarios and test cases Christopher B Ferris
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Christopher B Ferris

Friday, 19 January 2007

• Re: I volunteer for the UDDI scenario / test case definition work Rajesh Koilpillai
• I volunteer for the UDDI scenario / test case definition work Prasad Yendluri
• Re: [WS Policy Working Group Jan 2007 f2f day 2 2007-01-17] minutes (DRAFT) Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Sergey Beryozkin

Thursday, 18 January 2007

• NEW ISSUE (4263) [Primer] Inform domain specific processing of ignorability of assertions Frederick Hirsch

Friday, 19 January 2007

• Re: WS-Addressing comments relating to WS-Policy LC Anish Karmarkar

Thursday, 18 January 2007

• RE: NEW ISSUE: 3986 [Guidelines] Parameter vs. Nested Policy Decision at Domain Level? Daniel Roth
• RE: NEW ISSUE: [GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorab le o n the same assertion Prasad Yendluri
• Re: NEW ISSUE: [GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorable o n the same assertion Henry, William
• NEW ISSUE: [GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorable o n the same assertion Prasad Yendluri
• RE: Initial proposal for Issue 4041 Daniel Roth
• resolution to 4238 and 4196 Christopher B Ferris
• RE: Editorial issues in the Attachment spec Daniel Roth
• Proposed Resolutions to 4238 and 4196 Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: New ISSUE 4254: Ownership of WSP namespace Felix Sasaki
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer William Henry
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4251 - Change syntax of some WSDL 1.1 identifiers Ashok Malhotra
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4251 - Change syntax of some WSDL 1.1 identifiers David Orchard
• [NEW ISSUE] 4255 [Primer] Section 2.9 should also explain basic attaching William Henry

Wednesday, 17 January 2007

• [NEW ISSUE] 4253 [Primer] Basic Concepts section on Policy does not explain usage reasonably William Henry
• New ISSUE 4254: Ownership of WSP namespace Felix Sasaki
• ROUGH outkine of steps with suggested dates Christopher B Ferris
• Candidate Recommendation schedule and exit criteria Paul Cotton
• RE: [Bug 4235] clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the normalization algorithm can be applied to wsp:Policy element used as XML element policy attachment Asir Vedamuthu
• FW: [Bug 4240] Title: The distribution example does not follow the axioms in Section 4.3.3 Asir Vedamuthu
• [UPDATE] Issue 4206 - Updated Framework Proposal Only Monica J. Martin
• [UPDATE] Issue 4206 - Updated Framework Proposal Only Monica J. Martin
• RE: [Bug 4235] clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the normalization algorithm can be applied to wsp:Policy element used as XML element policy attachment Yalcinalp, Umit
• NEW ISSUE 4251 - Change syntax of some WSDL 1.1 identifiers Ashok Malhotra
• RE: Solution space for Issue 4127: Proposed WSDL 1.1 element identifiers can not deal with operation name overloading David Orchard
• RE: [Bug 4235] clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the normalization algorithm can be applied to wsp:Policy element used as XML element policy attachment Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4138: Normalization Algorithm is broken Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination Daniel Roth
• RE: ACTION-152 Review 4.4.8 with respect to the addition of the ignorable attribute Daniel Roth
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer Christopher B Ferris
• action 173 issue 4045 scoping of wsdl1.1 identifiers Christopher B Ferris
• Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 24 - 2007-01-16 to 2007-01-18 Christopher B Ferris
• Re: Issues omitted from f2f agenda Christopher B Ferris
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4235 clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the normalization algorithm can be applied to wsp:Policy element used as XML element policy attachment Christopher B Ferris
• [NEW ISSUE] 4238 framework spec does not formally define syntax (outline, etc) for compact form policy expression Christopher B Ferris
• resolutions to 4204 and 4207 Christopher B Ferris

Tuesday, 16 January 2007

• Issues omitted from f2f agenda Christopher B Ferris
• Re: WS-Addressing comments relating to WS-Policy LC Christopher B Ferris
• Re: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG (WS Policy issue 4188) Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Bug 4211] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Attachment Charlton Barreto
• Re: [Bug 4210] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Framework Charlton Barreto
• [NEW ISSUE] 4235 clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the normalization algorithm can be applied to wsp:Policy element used as XML element policy attachment Christopher B Ferris
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4138: Normalization Algorithm is broken Christopher B Ferris
• Re: [Guidelines] NEW ISSUE 4198: Policy assertion semantics independent of attachment mechanism Fabian Ritzmann
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4138: Normalization Algorithm is broken Yalcinalp, Umit
• FW: Last Call for C14N 1.1 Paul Cotton
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination Fabian Ritzmann
• Re: Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 24 - 2007-01-16 to 2007-01-18 Fabian Ritzmann
• Re: [NEW ISSUE]: 4207 misleading text in sect 2.2 (Attachments) Felix Sasaki
• WS-Policy Features and Interop Scenarios Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4138: Normalization Algorithm is broken Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: NEW Issue 4195: How to ignore some "ignorable" assertions only? Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: Initial proposal for Issue 4041 Frederick Hirsch
• RE: [NEW ISSUE]: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG Maryann Hondo
• RE: proposal for ACTION 181 Asir Vedamuthu
• proposal for ACTION 181 Maryann Hondo
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: [NEW ISSUE] 4230 normative text masquerading as non-normative guidance (Attachment) Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: [NEW ISSUE]: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG Christopher B Ferris
• [NEW ISSUE] 4230 normative text masquerading as non-normative guidance (Attachment) Christopher B Ferris

Monday, 15 January 2007

• Re: [NEW ISSUE]: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Suggested Feedback to WS-Policy Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Initial proposal for Issue 4041 Frederick Hirsch
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination Frederick Hirsch
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination Anthony Nadalin
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination Daniel Roth
• Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 24 - 2007-01-16 to 2007-01-18 Christopher B Ferris
• Issue 4225 (was RE: Editorial issues in the Framework spec Asir Vedamuthu
• Issue 4226 (was RE: Editorial issues in the Attachment spec Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: Solution space for Issue 4127: Proposed WSDL 1.1 element identifiers can not deal with operation name overloading Christopher B Ferris
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4224: [Framework] Section 4, last paragraph content is too restrictive - policy element information items are processed in multiple contexts Daniel Roth
• NEW ISSUE 4224: [Framewokrk] Section 4, last paragraph content is too restrictive - policy element information items are processed in multiple contexts Daniel Roth
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4138: Normalization Algorithm is broken Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4209: Example 3.1 does not follow the algorithm/definition in merging policies Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: NEW ISSUE: 4142 Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection Fabian Ritzmann
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4138: Normalization Algorithm is broken Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4209: Example 3.1 does not follow the algorithm/definition in merging policies Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 4142 Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection Yalcinalp, Umit

Sunday, 14 January 2007

• RE: [NEW ISSUE]: 4204 misleading text in sect 2.3 (Framework) Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: [Bug 4211] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Attachment Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: [Bug 4210] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Framework Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: [NEW ISSUE]: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG Asir Vedamuthu
• Editorial issues in the Attachment spec Daniel Roth
• Editorial issues in the Framework spec Daniel Roth
• RE: NEW Issue: How to ignore some "ignorable" assertions only? Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: [UPDATE] 4196 Minor Updates to Issue and Proposal Daniel Roth

Saturday, 13 January 2007

• RE: NEW ISSUE 4209: Example 3.1 does not follow the algorithm/definition in merging policies Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 4142 Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: [NEW ISSUE]: 4203 Introduction misleading (Framework) Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: [NEW ISSUE]: 4207 misleading text in sect 2.2 (Attachments) Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: [NEW ISSUE]: 4205 editorial nits WS-Policy 1.5 - Framework Asir Vedamuthu
• FW: WSDL WG interest in WS-Policy issues Paul Cotton
• Use of empty policy for nesting should be exemplified Yalcinalp, Umit
• [Bug 4211] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Attachment Paul Cotton
• [Bug 4210] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Framework Paul Cotton

Friday, 12 January 2007

• NEW ISSUE: Example 3.1 does not follow the algorithm/definition in merging policies Yalcinalp, Umit
• [UPDATE] 4196 Minor Updates to Issue and Proposal Monica J. Martin
• ACTION-174: See what XPointer are in line with WSDL and syntax David Orchard
• Bug 4208: identifiers should use WSDL 1.1 element names not WSDL 2.0 component names David Orchard
• RE: [NEW ISSUE] 4177 Disambiguate notational convention for choice syntax Yalcinalp, Umit
• Solution space for Issue 4127: Proposed WSDL 1.1 element identifiers can not deal with operation name overloading David Orchard
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination Yalcinalp, Umit
• [NEW ISSUE]: 4207 misleading text in sect 2.2 (Attachments) Christopher B Ferris
• NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination Fabian Ritzmann
• [NEW ISSUE]: 4205 editorial nits WS-Policy 1.5 - Framework Christopher B Ferris
• [NEW ISSUE]: 4204 misleading text in sect 2.3 (Framework) Christopher B Ferris
• RE: [NEW ISSUE] How to ignore some "ignorable" assertions only? Prasad Yendluri
• [NEW ISSUE]: 4203 Introduction misleading (Framework) Christopher B Ferris
• Re: [NEW ISSUE]: 4196 Clarify namespace restrictions (Framework and Primer) Felix Sasaki
• [Guidelines] NEW ISSUE 4198: Policy assertion semantics independent of attachment mechanism Fabian Ritzmann
• RE: [NEW ISSUE] 4177 Disambiguate notational convention for choice syntax Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: [NEW ISSUE] 4197 LC Inconsistency on treatment of unknown extensibility elements (Framework, Primer, Guidelines) Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer Felix Sasaki
• [NEW ISSUE] 4197 LC Inconsistency on treatment of unknown extensibility elements (Framework, Primer, Guidelines) Monica J. Martin
• [NEW ISSUE]: 4196 Clarify namespace restrictions (Framework and Primer) Monica J. Martin

Thursday, 11 January 2007

• Suggested Feedback to WS-Policy Ashok Malhotra
• RE: Initial proposal for Issue 4041 Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Initial proposal for Issue 4041 Frederick Hirsch
• RE: Initial proposal for Issue 4041 Prasad Yendluri

Wednesday, 10 January 2007

• RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Prasad Yendluri
• NEW Issue: How to ignore some "ignorable" assertions only? Prasad Yendluri

Thursday, 11 January 2007

• RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Anthony Nadalin

Wednesday, 10 January 2007

• Initial proposal for Issue 4041 Frederick Hirsch
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Anthony Nadalin
• Re: [V.Next] 4178 Declaration of policy domains in policy expressions Fabian Ritzmann
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Fabian Ritzmann
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4127: Proposed WSDL 1.1 element identifiers can not deal with operation name overloading David Orchard
• [NEW ISSUE]: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG Felix Sasaki
• RE: Last Call for C14N 1.1 (and updated WG notes) Paul Cotton
• Re: [V.Next] 4179 Preferences for policy expressions Christopher B Ferris
• RE: Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 23 - 2007-01-10 Sverdlov, Yakov
• Re: [V.Next] 4178 Declaration of policy domains in policy expressions Christopher B Ferris
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection Sergey Beryozkin
• [V.Next] 4179 Preferences for policy expressions Fabian Ritzmann
• [V.Next] 4178 Declaration of policy domains in policy expressions Fabian Ritzmann
• [NEW ISSUE] 4177 Disambiguate notational convention for choice syntax Fabian Ritzmann
• RE: [NEW ISSUE] 4150 Duplicate text exists in Section 3 and 3.2, PolicyAttachment Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Proposed solution for Issue 4141 Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: Updated Policy Drafts Frederick Hirsch

Tuesday, 9 January 2007

• Updated Policy Drafts Frederick Hirsch
• RE: Proposed solution for Issue 4141 Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Sergey Beryozkin
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Christopher B Ferris
• RE: Proposed solution for Issue 4141 Prasad Yendluri
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection Anthony Nadalin
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Tom Rutt
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Ashok Malhotra
• RE: Proposed solution for Issue 4141 Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Frederick Hirsch
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Sergey Beryozkin
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Ashok Malhotra
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer Felix Sasaki
• WS-Addressing comments relating to WS-Policy LC Bob Freund

Monday, 8 January 2007

• RE: Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 23 - 2007-01-10 Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: Concrete Proposal Around 3619 Tom Rutt
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Anthony Nadalin
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Tom Rutt
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Tom Rutt

Sunday, 7 January 2007

• RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Ashok Malhotra

Saturday, 6 January 2007

• Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 23 - 2007-01-10 Paul Cotton
• [DRAFT] Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 24 - 2007-01-16 to 2007-01-18 Paul Cotton

Friday, 5 January 2007

• [NEW ISSUE] 4150 Duplicate text exists in Section 3 and 3.2, PolicyAttachment Monica J. Martin
• RE: Proposed solution for Issue 4141 Prasad Yendluri
• Proposed solution for Issue 4141 Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer Philippe Le Hegaret

Thursday, 4 January 2007

• RE: Issue 4128 -- Action Item Dan Roth, Ashok Malhotra Christopher B Ferris
• RE: Issue 4128 -- Action Item Dan Roth, Ashok Malhotra Ashok Malhotra

Wednesday, 3 January 2007

• Re: Comment on Fragment Identifiers Amelia A Lewis
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: IRC Channel is down. Sanka Samaranyake
• IRC Channel is down. Monica J. Martin
• Re: [VER2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 22 - 2007-01-03 Mark Little
• [VER3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 22 - 2007-01-03 Christopher B Ferris
• RE: [VER2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 22 - 2007-01-03 Toufic Boubez
• NEW ISSUE: Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection Yalcinalp, Umit
• NEW ISSUE: Policy parameter definition is not accurate Yalcinalp, Umit

Tuesday, 2 January 2007

• RE: ws-policy 12/20/2006: Updated Issue and Proposal - Issue 4069 Daniel Roth
• NEW ISSUE: Normalization Algorithm is broken Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Christopher B Ferris
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Ashok Malhotra
• [VER2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 22 - 2007-01-03 Christopher B Ferris
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer Christopher B Ferris
• NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored Ashok Malhotra
• NEW ISSUE 4129: Attaching Policies to EPRs Ashok Malhotra
• NEW ISSUE 4128: Add References to WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 Component Syntax Ashok Malhotra
• AI 175 done Fabian Ritzmann
• NEW ISSUE 4127: Proposed WSDL 1.1 element identifiers can not deal with operation name overloading Fabian Ritzmann
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer Fabian Ritzmann

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 January 2007 00:31:22 UTC