Re: NEW ISSUE [Primer] : Update references to interoperability in Ignorable Policy Expressions section

> Ignorable is a property whose relevance is at the discretion of the 
> entity that computes the intersection. That may or may not be a policy 
> consumer.

No, absolutely not. Ignorability is at the discretion of the policy consumer only. Provider who marks
the assertion as being ignorable does not mean that this is something which can be ignored by the provider itself. Provider does it. Provider may itself act as the consumer but it still the case that the ignorability is at the discretion of consumer only

Cheers, Sergey



> 
> Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>> Target : WS-Policy Primer, Section 2.7
>>
>> Proposal : Update the last sentence : "Please note that the ignorableness is at
>> the discretion of policy consumers therefore ignorable assertions may have an
>> impact on determining compatibility of policies"
>>   
> 
> Ignorable is a property whose relevance is at the discretion of the 
> entity that computes the intersection. That may or may not be a policy 
> consumer.
> 
> Fabian
> 
>