- From: Monica J. Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:55:06 -0800
- To: "Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
- Cc: public-ws-policy@w3.org
- Message-id: <45D3A15A.1010606@sun.com>
Umit and Maryann, We'd suggest some minor editorial comments to this proposed text, and consideration if a best practice may also be advised. See .pdf and .htm attached with redlines. Thanks. >Yalcinalp, Umit wrote: The following text completes our action item 218 for Subject Attachment >Extensibility. It is proposed as a new subsection in Section 5. > >Umit and Maryann > >[Action 218] http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/218 >Note: The text will use the reference that is already existing in the >guidelines document to WS-RM Policy. > > >------------------------------------- >5.3 Subject Attachment Extensibility: >Overtime, a policy expression may evolve to be applicable to policy >subjects different than the policy subjects that it was originally >designed for. When this type of evolution occurs, the author of the >assertion should carefully consider the applicability of this usage with >respect to the compatibility of the assertion's semantics. When an >assertion needs to evolve to indicate a behavior that is no longer >compatible with its originally intended semantics or policy subjects, a >new namespace should be designed to designate the new behavior that is >signified with the new namespace. Section 5.2 further clarifies the >usage of multiple behaviors. >In general, it is NOT recommended to deprecate policy subjects by >reducing the policy subjects that an assertion was originally designed >for. >When the assertion's semantics does not change to invalidate any of the >original policy subjects but new policy subjects need to be added, it >may be possible to use the same assertion to designate the additional >policy subjects without a namespace change. The authors must retain the >compatible behavior of the policy assertion. For example, a policy >assertion for a protocol that is originally designed for endpoint policy >subject may add message policy subject to indicate finer granular >attachment provided that endpoint policy subject is also retained in its >design. This approach has been used by WS-RM Policy. > >---------------------- > >Dr. Umit Yalcinalp >Research Scientist >SAP Labs, LLC >Email: umit.yalcinalp@sap.com Tel: (650) 320-3095 >SDN: https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/u/36238 >-------- >"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's >character, give him power." Abraham Lincoln. > > > > >
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: suggested-revisions-action-218.pdf
- text/html attachment: suggested-revisions-action-218.htm
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2007 23:55:26 UTC