W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > February 2007

FW: [Bug 4311] test suite framework?

From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:16:52 -0800
To: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C9BF0238EED3634BA1866AEF14C7A9E534E29EAA1E@NA-EXMSG-C116.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

I think we should consider few more questions as we think through this:

f) What is the additional cost imposed by a test suite framework on interop implementers?
g) What is the interaction between a schedule for test suite framework development and the CR schedule?
h) What is the minimum needed to declare victory on CR interop testing?


Asir S Vedamuthu
Microsoft Corporation

-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-policy-qa-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-qa-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 12:33 PM
To: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
Subject: [Bug 4311] test suite framework?


           Summary: test suite framework?
           Product: WS-Policy
           Version: FPWD
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Test Suite
        AssignedTo: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
        ReportedBy: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
         QAContact: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org

Title: Test suite framework?

Description: To repeat what I think Felix said, is there an alternative
> document template for test cases, e.g. like WSDL groups'
> Should the WG use a framework for test case dev?
> Who would prepare such a framework?
> Who would maintain the framework?
> Who would contribute test cases that conform to the framework?
> What is the schedule for such a test case framework?

(NOTE: need link to the IRC minutes where this was discussed)

Proposal: TBD
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 23:17:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:33:25 UTC