- From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:16:52 -0800
- To: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
I think we should consider few more questions as we think through this:
f) What is the additional cost imposed by a test suite framework on interop implementers?
g) What is the interaction between a schedule for test suite framework development and the CR schedule?
h) What is the minimum needed to declare victory on CR interop testing?
Regards,
Asir S Vedamuthu
Microsoft Corporation
-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-policy-qa-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-qa-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 12:33 PM
To: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
Subject: [Bug 4311] test suite framework?
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4311
Summary: test suite framework?
Product: WS-Policy
Version: FPWD
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Test Suite
AssignedTo: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
ReportedBy: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
QAContact: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
Title: Test suite framework?
Description: To repeat what I think Felix said, is there an alternative
> document template for test cases, e.g. like WSDL groups'
> Should the WG use a framework for test case dev?
> Who would prepare such a framework?
> Who would maintain the framework?
> Who would contribute test cases that conform to the framework?
> What is the schedule for such a test case framework?
(NOTE: need link to the IRC minutes where this was discussed)
Proposal: TBD
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 23:17:05 UTC