- From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:16:52 -0800
- To: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
I think we should consider few more questions as we think through this: f) What is the additional cost imposed by a test suite framework on interop implementers? g) What is the interaction between a schedule for test suite framework development and the CR schedule? h) What is the minimum needed to declare victory on CR interop testing? Regards, Asir S Vedamuthu Microsoft Corporation -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-policy-qa-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-qa-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 12:33 PM To: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org Subject: [Bug 4311] test suite framework? http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4311 Summary: test suite framework? Product: WS-Policy Version: FPWD Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Test Suite AssignedTo: chrisfer@us.ibm.com ReportedBy: chrisfer@us.ibm.com QAContact: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org Title: Test suite framework? Description: To repeat what I think Felix said, is there an alternative > document template for test cases, e.g. like WSDL groups' > Should the WG use a framework for test case dev? > Who would prepare such a framework? > Who would maintain the framework? > Who would contribute test cases that conform to the framework? > What is the schedule for such a test case framework? (NOTE: need link to the IRC minutes where this was discussed) Proposal: TBD
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 23:17:05 UTC