Ashok,
Are you opening a new issue? or simply making an observation?
If the former, please create a bugzilla issue for this so that we can
track it.
Cheers,
Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
phone: +1 508 234 2986
public-ws-policy-request@w3.org wrote on 08/13/2007 06:39:12 PM:
>
> Consider a policy that includes Reliable Messaging, Header Encryption
> and Signing.
> It seems clear that the Reliable Messaging headers should be added
> first, the headers encrypted next that finally the signature created and
> affixed. At the receiving end, the signature should be checked first,
> the headers decrypted next and finally the Reliable Messaging headers
> processed. This implies that the Policy assertions be processed in a
> definite sequence.
>
> The framework document says:
> "Assertions within an alternative are not ordered, and thus aspects such
> as the order in which behaviors (indicated by assertions) are applied to
> a subject
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/PR-ws-policy-20070706/#policy_subject> are
> beyond the scope of this specification. However, authors can write
> assertions that control the order in which behaviors are applied."
>
> It seems to me that this is a fairly common scenario and it may be good
> to show an example, in the Guidelines document,.of how such an ordering
> assertion may be authored.
> --
> All the best, Ashok
>