Editors Action 32 resolution

Hi all,

Editors Action 32 is entitled "Hyperlink terms such as policy
expression, policy alternative, etc. (this should be a global search and
change)"

Resolution
----------
The Policy Editors recommend against linking every single instance of a
term to the definition. We believe this would lead to a more difficult
to read document. We believe that the first occurence of a term in a
minor section should be sufficient. 

I have gone through the following sections looking for the first
occurance of a defined policy term, and done the additions below: 

Policy-Framework 
---------------- 
Up to 3.3 - 
3.4 - assertion 
4.0 - policy 
4.1 - alternatives, assertions 
4.2 - 
4.3 - policy, policy expression 
4.3.1 - policy alternative 
4.3.2 - 
4.3.3 - policy 
4.3.4 - 
4.3.5 - 
5 - policy, assertion, scope, policy expressions 

Policy-attachment 
----------------- 
up to 3.3 - 
3.3 - policies, policy subject, policy assertion 
3.4 - 
4, 5, 6 - (note the plethora of linking in 4.1, 5.2, 6) 

If I have missed any please let me know.  If this is not acceptable,
please let the editors know.

Thanks,
Dave
On behalf of Ws-policy edtiors.