- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:13:06 -0400
- To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
- Cc: Hirsch Frederick <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
I think I agree with what Umit said during the call, perhaps we should flag assertions that only apply to the provider, perhaps with a "provider-only" attribute. This is declarative of the fact that this assertion has no wire impact and only states that the assertion applies to the provider. Unlike "local" and "advisory" this does not attempt to imply how a client should behave knowing this information. In other words treat optionality and provider-only as orthogonal (especially since optionality is about policy alternatives). regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia
Received on Wednesday, 25 October 2006 20:13:33 UTC