- From: Yalcinalp, Umit <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:04:31 -0700
- To: "Frederick Hirsch" <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Frederick Hirsch [mailto:frederick.hirsch@nokia.com] > Sent: Wednesday, Oct 25, 2006 8:57 AM > To: Yalcinalp, Umit > Cc: Frederick Hirsch; public-ws-policy@w3.org > Subject: Re: Guidelines Document > > Umit > > Thanks for the update. > > I noticed that the following comments were not addressed (the others > were), thus I think some more changes might be needed. > > Comments on Content > > 1) Add wsp:Policy elements to Example 8.4 CompanyAProfileB (fully > expanded), and also example 8.6 > - wsp:Policy element required as child of sp:TransportBinding and > parent of sp:TransportToken, since sp:TransportToken is an assertion. I added wsp:Policy elements, it appears not all the examples were updated. I will do a new pass. > > 4) Add guidance as to when and why to use parameters versus nested > assertions. I think it would make the document flow better and be > clearer if section 5.4 "Assertions with Parameters" were to be > combined with 5.5 "Comparison of Nested and Parametrized Assertions" > and placed before 5.3 "Nested Assertions". This could answer the > question of when to use parameters versus nested assertions before > getting into the details of nested assertions. > You are right. We are still planning to do that. > 5) Add description and guidance related to policy and SOAP > intermediary processing, before section 5.6 Self Describing Messages This one is new, I think. I am not sure what kind of guidance to add. Perhaps you would like to suggest some text. > > Editorial comments > > 2) Pretty-print (indent) all xml for readability This was handled on the first checked in version. I think we may be losing this due to using different XML tools as two of us are working on it. I will ask other editors how they resolve this problem. Maybe there is a step in the Eclipse environment that will help. > 8) 2.1.3 s/can reflect its on the wire/can specify its on-the-wire/ > 15) 5.4 1st bullet > > s/which can not/that cannot/ Ok. > > 16) 5.6 > put last paragraph first removing "REWRITEAs a result,". This last > paragraph is the main concept. Tighten earlier material. I introduced tightening by adding a separate paragraph afterwards. Moving the paragraph did not work very well, but we can look at it again if you think this is really critical. > > (i.e, this is first: > As a result, Policy assertions should not be used to express the > semantics of a message. If a property is required to understand a > message, it should be communicated in the message, or be made > available by some other means(e.g., being referenced by a URI in the > message) rather than communicated as a policy element.) > > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch > Nokia > > > On Oct 19, 2006, at 7:57 PM, ext Yalcinalp, Umit wrote: > > > All, > > > > Please find the first version of the guidelines document in > [1] and > > send comments/issues. > > > > Frederick, would you verify the comments you have raised has been > > adressed to your satisfaction. > > > > Regards, > > > > --umit > > > > [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy- > > guidelines.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 > > > > ---------------------- > > > > Dr. Umit Yalcinalp > > Architect > > NetWeaver Industry Standards > > SAP Labs, LLC > > Email: umit.yalcinalp@sap.com Tel: (650) 320-3095 > > SDN: https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/u/36238 > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 25 October 2006 16:10:22 UTC