- From: Toufic Boubez <tboubez@layer7tech.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:08:58 -0700
- To: "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Prasad Yendluri" <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>, <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <970F9C1BF72BF24C8932796D254568B7D4CB5C@layer7-mx0.l7tech.local>
+1. I thought I had already done that, but I guess not ... -- Toufic Toufic Boubez, Ph.D. Chief Technology Officer LAYER 7 TECHNOLOGIES / Advancing the application network. 604.681.9377 x310 (w) 604.288.7970 (m) tboubez@layer7tech.com <mailto:tboubez@layer7tech.com> (e) www.layer7tech.com (w) ________________________________ From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org on behalf of Paul Cotton Sent: Mon 10/23/2006 1:21 PM To: Prasad Yendluri; 'public-ws-policy@w3.org' Subject: RE: Action Item 110 +1. Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com ________________________________ From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Prasad Yendluri Sent: October 23, 2006 4:14 PM To: 'public-ws-policy@w3.org' Subject: Action Item 110 Hi, This is regarding AI 110 - http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/110 AI-110 was given to the editors to, "Review next editors draft to see if there are any security considerations from framework doc that apply to attachment doc". This was a result of moving of the security considerations section from the Primer to the Framework specification. I have reviewed the security considerations sections in current editors drafts (see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Oct/0111.html) of both Framework and Attachment specifications. The WS-Policy 1.5 Attachment specification already reflects the security considerations <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-attachment.html#SecurityConsiderations> that are directly applicable to Policy Attachments <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-attachment.html#policy_attachment> . However it could be useful to add a sentence that points to the Security Consideration Section of the Framework specification <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-framework.html#Security_Considerations> , so that some of the items that are applicable in general are also pointed to from here (e.g. Spoofing and Tampering and General XML considerations). There is no need to duplicate that information. A simple "See also the Security Considerations Section in the WS-Policy 1.5 Framework Specification", should suffice. Thanks, Prasad
Received on Tuesday, 24 October 2006 05:11:02 UTC