- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:45:12 +0900
- To: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
I also agree with the proposal. Felix Christopher B Ferris wrote: > > +1 > > Christopher Ferris > STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy > email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com > blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris > phone: +1 508 377 9295 > > public-ws-policy-request@w3.org wrote on 10/09/2006 08:30:53 PM: > >> ACTION-124 >> Paul and Chris to draft status section and proposed ednotes for >> Primer referencing pending work on guidelines and possible issue >> resolutions resulting in content being moved. etc >> http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/124 >> >> Personally I think the following status section based on what we >> used for the first Framework WD is completely okay. It explicitly > states: >> a) that the document is a transcription of the original contribution >> b) that the WG has not yet agreed with all the material >> c) “publication is not endorsement” >> >> === >> Status of this Document >> This section describes the status of this document at the time of >> its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list >> of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this >> technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at >> http://www.w3.org/TR/. >> This is the First Public Working Draft of the Web Services Policy 1. >> 5 - Primer specification. This Working Draft was produced by the >> members of the Web Services Policy Working Group. The Working Group >> has not yet decided if it will advance this Working Draft to >> Recommendation Status. It represents a transcription of the original >> contribution into the W3C style. >> Note that this Working Draft does not necessarily represent a >> consensus of the Working Group. Discussion of this document takes >> place on the public public-ws-policy@w3.org mailing list (public archive >> ) and within Bugzilla. Comments on this specification should be made >> following the Description for Issues of the Working Group. >> Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C >> Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or >> obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to >> cite this document as other than work in progress. >> This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February >> 2004 W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent > disclosures >> made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page >> also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual >> who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes > contains >> Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance with >> section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy. >> >> If any addition words are needed then I would suggest the following >> additional text in the second paragraph before the last sentence: >> >> Several issues have already been filed on this document and are > recorded in >> Bugzilla. The WG has not yet considered these issues and how they >> relate to the Working Group’s plans to publish another document >> current entitled “Guidelines for Policy Assertion Authors”. >> >> /paulc >> >> PS: Note that the Bugzilla hyperlinks are searches that explicitly >> return only Primer issues. >> >> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada >> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 >> Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 >> mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com >> >> >> >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] >> > Sent: October 5, 2006 10:16 PM >> > To: Paul Cotton >> > Cc: Christopher B Ferris >> > Subject: RE: Template for status section >> > >> > > Your attachment was missing. >> > >> > hoops, sorry. Here it is. >> > >> > > >> > > /paulc >> > > >> > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada >> > > 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 >> > > Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 >> > > mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -----Original Message----- >> > >> From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] >> > >> Sent: October 5, 2006 12:29 AM >> > >> To: Paul Cotton; chrisfer@us.ibm.com >> > >> Subject: Template for status section >> > >> >> > >> Hi Paul, Chris, >> > >> >> > >> Attached is my template to the status section. It contains an entity >> > >> call >> > >> for &primer.title; , so it is not well-formed as is. >> > >> >> > >> Be aware that it contains the expectation "The Working Group > expects to >> > >> advance this Working Draft to Recommendation Status.", although the >> > >> Working Group has not decided this yet. >> > >> >> > >> Regarding our action item >> > >> [[Felix Paul and Chris to draft status section and proposed > ednotes for >> > >> Primer referencing pending work on guidelines and possible issue >> > >> resolutions resulting in content being moved. etc [recorded in >> > >> http://www.w3.org/2006/10/04-ws-policy-minutes.html#action06]]] >> > >> I was fine with what Paul proposed: "how about the text saying the >> > final >> > >> location of the text will depend on the resolution of this > issue". But >> > I >> > >> would also propose to mention the guidelines document explicitely. I >> > >> know >> > >> that this is dangerous since the Working Group has not yet > approved to >> > >> produce the guidelines. But it would help to get Umits and Maryanns >> > >> agreement. >> > >> For the AI part "proposed ednotes", I would add such an ednote in > each >> > >> section which has a separate issue: sec. 4 (issue 3792), sec. 3 > (3794), >> > >> sec. 2.4 (3795). >> > >> >> > >> These are just proposals for discussion. >> > >> >> > >> Felix >> > > >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2006 13:45:23 UTC