ACTION-124: Status section for WS-Policy Primer

ACTION-124
Paul and Chris to draft status section and proposed ednotes for Primer referencing pending work on guidelines and possible issue resolutions resulting in content being moved. etc

http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/124



Personally I think the following status section based on what we used for the first Framework WD is completely okay.  It explicitly states:

a)    that the document is a transcription of the original contribution

b)    that the WG has not yet agreed with all the material

c)    "publication is not endorsement"



===

Status of this Document

This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index<http://www.w3.org/TR/> at http://www.w3.org/TR/.

This is the First Public Working Draft<http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/tr.html#first-wd> of the Web Services Policy 1.5 - Primer specification. This Working Draft was produced by the members of the Web Services Policy Working Group<http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/>. The Working Group has not yet decided if it will advance this Working Draft to Recommendation Status. It represents a transcription of the original contribution<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0001.html> into the W3C style.

Note that this Working Draft does not necessarily represent a consensus of the Working Group.  Discussion of this document takes place on the public public-ws-policy@w3.org<mailto:public-ws-policy@w3.org> mailing list (public archive<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/>) and within Bugzilla<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=WS-Policy&component=Primer>. Comments on this specification should be made following the Description for Issues<http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/#issues> of the Working Group.

Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress.

This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February 2004 W3C Patent Policy<http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/>. W3C maintains a public list of any patent disclosures<http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/39293/status> made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s)<http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#def-essential> must disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy<http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Disclosure>.



If any addition words are needed then I would suggest the following additional text in the second paragraph before the last sentence:



Several issues have already been filed on this document and are recorded in Bugzilla<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=WS-Policy&component=Primer>.  The WG has not yet considered these issues and how they relate to the Working Group's plans to publish another document current entitled "Guidelines for Policy Assertion Authors".



/paulc



PS: Note that the Bugzilla hyperlinks are searches that explicitly return only Primer issues.



Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada

17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3

Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329

mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com











> -----Original Message-----

> From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]

> Sent: October 5, 2006 10:16 PM

> To: Paul Cotton

> Cc: Christopher B Ferris

> Subject: RE: Template for status section

>

> > Your attachment was missing.

>

> hoops, sorry. Here it is.

>

> >

> > /paulc

> >

> > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada

> > 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3

> > Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329

> > mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >> -----Original Message-----

> >> From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]

> >> Sent: October 5, 2006 12:29 AM

> >> To: Paul Cotton; chrisfer@us.ibm.com

> >> Subject: Template for status section

> >>

> >> Hi Paul, Chris,

> >>

> >> Attached is my template to the status section. It contains an entity

> >> call

> >> for &primer.title; , so it is not well-formed as is.

> >>

> >> Be aware that it contains the expectation "The Working Group expects to

> >> advance this Working Draft to Recommendation Status.", although the

> >> Working Group has not decided this yet.

> >>

> >> Regarding our action item

> >> [[Felix Paul and Chris to draft status section and proposed ednotes for

> >> Primer referencing pending work on guidelines and possible issue

> >> resolutions resulting in content being moved. etc [recorded in

> >> http://www.w3.org/2006/10/04-ws-policy-minutes.html#action06]]]

> >> I was fine with what Paul proposed: "how about the text saying the

> final

> >> location of the text will depend on the resolution of this issue". But

> I

> >> would also propose to mention the guidelines document explicitely. I

> >> know

> >> that this is dangerous since the Working Group has not yet approved to

> >> produce the guidelines. But it would help to get Umits and Maryanns

> >> agreement.

> >> For the AI part "proposed ednotes", I would add such an ednote in each

> >> section which has a separate issue: sec. 4 (issue 3792), sec. 3 (3794),

> >> sec. 2.4 (3795).

> >>

> >> These are just proposals for discussion.

> >>

> >> Felix

> >

> >