Tuesday, 31 October 2006
- Proposed Resolution: Primer Issue 3809 (was FW: [Bug 3809] Primer uses an Assertion that does not exist
- Proposed Resolution: Primer Issue 3795 (was FW: [Bug 3795] Section 2.4- usefulness
- Proposed Resolution for Issue 3794 (was FW: [Bug 3794] Section 3 overlap of primer with guidelines
- Proposed Action: Primer Issue 3792 (was FW: [Bug 3792] section 4 of the primer overlaps with the guidelines document
- Proposed Resolution: Primer Issue 3791 (was FW: [Bug 3791] primer/guidelines overlap
- RE: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral req uirements on the requester
- RE: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral req uirements on the requester
- RE: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral req uirements on the requester
- RE: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral req uirements on the requester
- RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester
- RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- [VER 2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 15 - 2006-11-01
- RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- Editors Action 32 resolution
- RE: RE: Guidelines Document
- Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 15 - 2006-11-01
- RE: Guidelines Document
Monday, 30 October 2006
- RE: NEW Issue [3894]: Definition of equivalence for WSDL 2.0 component model {policy} properties
- NEW Issue [3894]: Definition of equivalence for WSDL 2.0 component model {policy} properties
- Re: optionality and provider-only orthogonal
- RE: RE: Revised proposal for Bug 3730
Saturday, 28 October 2006
Thursday, 26 October 2006
- RE: optionality and provider-only orthogonal
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester
- Policy alternatives (Was : Clarify usage...)
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester
- Re: optionality and provider-only orthogonal
- RE: optionality and provider-only orthogonal
Wednesday, 25 October 2006
- Re: optionality and provider-only orthogonal
- RE: optionality and provider-only orthogonal
- Re: optionality and provider-only orthogonal
- RE: optionality and provider-only orthogonal
- optionality and provider-only orthogonal
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester
- RE: RE: Revised proposal for Bug 3730
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester
- RE: RE: Revised proposal for Bug 3730
- RE: Proposal for Resolution of 3564
- RE: Proposal for Resolution of 3564
- RE: Proposal for Resolution of 3564
- RE: Proposal for Resolution of 3564
- RE: Guidelines Document
- RE: Proposal for Resolution of 3564
- Re: Guidelines Document
- RE: Proposal for Resolution of 3564
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester
- RE: Proposal for Resolution of 3564
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- Regrets - flight changes
- RE: Proposal for Resolution of 3564
- [VER2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 14 - 2006-10-25
- Definition of Interaction Bug 3705
- RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
Tuesday, 24 October 2006
Monday, 23 October 2006
- RE: Action Item 110
- Action Item 110
- Re: Proposal for Resolution of 3564
- Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 14 - 2006-10-25
Friday, 20 October 2006
- RE: Guidelines Document
- List of issues addressed the 3rd Editors' Drafts of WS-Policy Fra mework and Attachment specifications
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- partial regrets for 10/25
Thursday, 19 October 2006
- Guidelines Document
- RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
Wednesday, 18 October 2006
- RE: New C14N/1.1 WD and Web Services Policy 1.5 - Framework (ed. copy)
- RE: Third Editors' Drafts of WS-Policy Framework and Attachment Specifications for Approval as Public WDs
- RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- [VER2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 13 - 2006-10-18
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- RE: RE: Policy Retrieval Algorithms
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requeste
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requeste
- RE: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requeste
- ACTION-96
- RE: Revised proposal for Bug 3730
- RE: ACTION-48 update
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- RE: ACTION-48 update
- Re: assertion classes
- Re: assertion classes
Tuesday, 17 October 2006
- RE: RE: NEW ISSUE: References section contains reference to obsolete version of WS-RM policy.
- RE: RE: NEW ISSUE: References section contains reference to obsolete version of WS-RM policy.
- RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- RE: Revised proposal for Bug 3730
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requeste
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester
- Third Editors' Drafts of WS-Policy Framework and Attachment Speci fications for Approval as Public WDs
Sunday, 15 October 2006
Saturday, 14 October 2006
- RE: RE: NEW ISSUE: References section contains reference to obsolete version of WS-RM policy.
- RE: NEW ISSUE: References section contains reference to obsolete version of WS-RM policy.
Friday, 13 October 2006
Wednesday, 11 October 2006
- RE: New C14N/1.1 WD and Web Services Policy 1.5 - Framework (ed. copy)
- RE: Revised proposal for Bug 3730
- Regrets Oct. 11
- RE: assertion classes
- RE: Policy Retrieval Algorithms
- RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- Re: assertion classes
- RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- Re: assertion classes
- RE: assertion classes
- RE: ACTION-48 update
- RE: Bug 3599
- RE: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected?
Tuesday, 10 October 2006
- ACTION-48 update
- Re: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected?
- assertion classes
- RE: ACTION-124: Status section for WS-Policy Primer
- Re: ACTION-124: Status section for WS-Policy Primer
- Re: ACTION-124: Status section for WS-Policy Primer
- RE: Bug 3599
- Re: Bug 3599
- ACTION-124: Status section for WS-Policy Primer
- Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 12 - 2006-10-11
Monday, 9 October 2006
- RE: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requeste
- RE: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral r equirements on the requeste
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requeste
- RE: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected?
- regrets for 10/11 conf
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- Re: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected?
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requeste
Friday, 6 October 2006
- RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- RE: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requeste
- ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected?
- RE: RE: Simplifying the meaning of assertions and wsp:optional
- Bug 3599
- Revised proposal for Bug 3730
- RE: WS-Policy reference indirection
- RE: WS-Policy reference indirection
- Policy Retrieval Algorithms
- RE: WS-Policy reference indirection
- RE: Comments on Guidelines document
- RE: Action item 125
- RE: Action item 125
- RE: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requeste
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requeste
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- Re: Discussion on issue 3599
- Re: Comments on Guidelines document
- Re: Action item 125
- NEW ISSUE: Primer uses an assertion for MTOM that does not exist
Thursday, 5 October 2006
- RE: Discussion on issue 3599
- RE: Discussion on issue 3599
- Comments on Guidelines document
- RE: Action item 125
- Action item 125
- Discussion on issue 3599
Wednesday, 4 October 2006
- RE: Pl. remove references to proprietary documents from primer -- Bug 3797
- RE: RE: RE: NEW ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected?
- Pl. remove references to proprietary documents from primer -- Bug 3797
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- RE: RE: RE: NEW ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected?
- RE: RE: NEW ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected?
- RE: WS-Policy reference indirection
- RE: RE: NEW ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected?
- RE: New C14N/1.1 WD and Web Services Policy 1.5 - Framework (ed. copy)
- RE: RE: Updated Editors Draft of WS-Policy 1.5 Primer - For Approval as Public WD
- Re: [VER3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 11 - 2006-10-04
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- RE: New Issue 3793: Add example about policies in the context of relationships between multiple entities
- new Issues- primer/guidelines overlap
- Re: [VER3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 11 - 2006-10-04
- [VER3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 11 - 2006-10-04
- RE: New Issue 3793: Add example about policies in the context of relationships between multiple entities
- Re: New Issue 3793: Add example about policies in the context of relationships between multiple entities
- New Issue 3793: Add example about policies in the context of relationships between multiple entities
- Re: Simplifying the meaning of assertions and wsp:optional
- Re: [VER2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 11 - 2006-10-04
- NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requeste
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- RE: RE: Updated Editors Draft of WS-Policy 1.5 Primer - For Approval as Public WD
- RE: RE: Updated Editors Draft of WS-Policy 1.5 Primer - For Approval as Public WD
- RE: RE: Updated Editors Draft of WS-Policy 1.5 Primer - For Approval as Public WD
- RE: RE: Updated Editors Draft of WS-Policy 1.5 Primer - For Approval as Public WD
- RE: Updated Editors Draft of WS-Policy 1.5 Primer - For Approval as Public WD
Tuesday, 3 October 2006
- Re: [VER2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 11 - 2006-10-04
- Proposal for Resolution of 3564
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- RE: Simplifying the meaning of assertions and wsp:optional
- RE: RE: [Bug 3656] Using UsingAddressing Extension Element as a WS-Policy assertion
- RE: [Bug 3656] Using UsingAddressing Extension Element as a WS-Policy assertion
- Proposed Issue 3270 resolution
- [VER2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 11 - 2006-10-04
Monday, 2 October 2006
- RE: Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 11 - 2006-10-04
- RE: Updated Editors Draft of WS-Policy 1.5 Primer - For Approval as Public WD
- Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 11 - 2006-10-04
- RE: Proposal for Bug 3730
- RE: Proposal for Bug 3730
- RE: Updated Editors Draft of WS-Policy 1.5 Primer - For Approval as Public WD
- Re: Simplifying the meaning of assertions and wsp:optional
- Re: Simplifying the meaning of assertions and wsp:optional
- Re: Simplifying the meaning of assertions and wsp:optional
- RE: Simplifying the meaning of assertions and wsp:optional
- Re: Simplifying the meaning of assertions and wsp:optional
- RE: Simplifying the meaning of assertions and wsp:optional