- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:00:18 -0500
- To: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
- Cc: public-ws-policy@w3.org, public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF8DB62DF1.EE55E0E3-ON85257242.003E23B1-85257242.00476AC2@us.ibm.com>
+1 Christopher Ferris STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris phone: +1 508 377 9295 Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com> Sent by: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 12/11/2006 04:03 PM To Christopher B Ferris/Waltham/IBM@IBMUS, <public-ws-policy@w3.org> cc Subject RE: [NEW ISSUE] 4039 WS-Policy does not define its relationship to XML Base "The deployment of XML Base is through normative reference by new specifications, for example XLink and the XML Infoset. Applications and specifications built upon these new technologies will natively support XML Base." [1] XML Information Set specification has a normative dependency on XML Base [2]. Any specification built upon XML Information Set will natively support XML Base. Web Services Policy is built upon XML Information Set. So, it doesn't hurt to explicitly call out the support for XML Base. The following is a list of proposed changes to resolve issue 4039: Framework: a) Add a new section 4.6 4.6 Use of IRIs in Policy Expressions Policy expressions use IRIs for some identifiers. This document does not define a base URI but relies on the mechanisms defined in XML Base [XML Base] and RFC 3987 [RFC 3987] for establishing a base URI against which relative IRIs can be made absolute. b) Updates to the application/wspolicy+xml Media Type s/Base URI: As specified in RFC 3023, section 6. /Base URI: As specified in RFC 3023, section 6. Also see section 4.6 Use of IRIs in Policy Expressions in this document and section 3.5 Use of IRIs in Policy Attachment in the Web Services Policy 1.5 - Attachment. / c) Add a normative reference to XML Base. Attachment: d) Add a new section 3.5 3.5 Use of IRIs in Policy Attachment Policy attachment mechanisms use IRIs for some identifiers. This document does not define a base URI but relies on the mechanisms defined in XML Base [XML Base] and RFC 3987 [RFC 3987] for establishing a base URI against which relative IRIs can be made absolute. e) Add a normative reference to XML Base. General: f) XML Base Second Edition This month, the XML Core WG plans to advance [3] the XML Base Second Edition draft as a Proposed Recommendation. Editors should take a tickler action to refresh the XML Base reference (Second Edition) prior to CR publication. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlbase-20010627/#introduction [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-infoset-20040204/#references [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2006OctDec/0085.html Regards, Asir S Vedamuthu Microsoft Corporation From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Christopher B Ferris Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 8:17 AM To: public-ws-policy@w3.org Subject: [NEW ISSUE] 4039 WS-Policy does not define its relationship to XML Base http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4039 Title: WS-Policy does not define its relationship to XML Base [1] Description: WS-Policy does not define its relationship to XML Base [1] Justification: The XML Base spec says: The deployment of XML Base is through normative reference by new specifications, for example XLink and the XML Infoset. Applications and specifications built upon these new technologies will natively support XML Base. The behavior of xml:base attributes in applications based on specifications that do not have direct or indirect normative reference to XML Base is undefined. Unspecifying the relationship to XML Base will likely lead to interoperability problems, since by definition, behavior is undefined. Proposal: TBD, but roughly treat along the lines of how SOAP1.2 has handled it [2] [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlbase-20010627/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/#useofuris Cheers, Christopher Ferris STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris phone: +1 508 377 9295
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2006 13:00:39 UTC