- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:51:54 -0700
- To: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
- CC: Maryann Hondo <mhondo@us.ibm.com>, "Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM" <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>, Bob Freund-Hitachi <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
Add an issue on coordination with other working groups http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3619 Maryann carried out her action to ask the WS-Addressing WG to review the example in Section 3.4 of WS-PolicyAttachments: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2006Aug/0087.html We need to consider the questions asked by Marc Hadley in his response to Maryann's request: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2006Aug/0089.html "Have you considered the semantics when other things are included in the EndpointReference. In particular, if the EPR contains a metadata element with an embedded wsp:Policy (either directly or via an intermediate embedded or referenced WSDL), how are the policies reconciled?" WG members are encouraged to reply to this thread to help the WG to reach consensus on how to reply to Marc's question. /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com
Received on Wednesday, 30 August 2006 20:53:08 UTC