W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > August 2006

RE: 3459 Proposed change to Framework 3.1

From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:38:01 -0700
Message-ID: <4DF3D07B9910264B9470DA1F811D1A950B3926E1@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Frederick Hirsch" <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, <public-ws-policy@w3.org>

[Added issue number to the subject line]

> The attributes property is an assertion parameter.

In the XML representation, assertion parameters may be represented as
child XML elements or attributes of an assertion. [attributes] property
may contain zero or more assertion parameters.

> The children property may contain assertion 
> parameters and/or nested assertions.

This doesn't sound right. Assertion/wsp:Policy is a nested policy
expression [1] (it is not an assertion or a nested assertion).


On the archive, there are three proposals [2][3][4] to fix issue 3459. A
description on what we are trying to clarify would be helpful.

[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0022
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/0063
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/0117 

Asir S Vedamuthu
Microsoft Corporation

-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frederick Hirsch
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 10:01 AM
To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
Cc: Hirsch Frederick
Subject: Proposed change to Framework 3.1

I propose the following change to 3.1, "Policy Assertion" in the  
latest editor's draft of the policy framework [1]. The change is  
shown as a red-line to 3.1, in the attached PDF.

This is proposed as a partial resolution to bug report 3549 [2] and  
as a replacement to previous proposals regarding text to clarify the  
framework with regards to this issue.

I propose the issue with regards to the normalization procedure in  
4.2 (as also noted in the bug report) should be made a separate  
issue. This normalization procedure does not appear to explicitly  
pass through parameters.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch

[1] <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy- 

[2] <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3549>
Received on Tuesday, 22 August 2006 18:38:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:33:13 UTC