- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:28:05 +0900
- To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
- Message-id: <44DAB5D5.3080101@w3.org>
Hello, Regarding my Action item [1] "Felix to update the issue http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0028.htm with more information about cascading changes." and Paul's request from today's call [2] "(I) want to see where URIs are used and how change would impact" I took Jonathan Marsh's mail [3] about the IRI adoption in addressing (which Chris pointed to at [4]) as an input. CHANGES IN THE FRAMEWORK DOCUMENT - I don't see a need to change "All information items defined by this specification are identified by the XML namespace URI [XML Namespaces]", since this is an URI. I don't expect a possibly necessary new XML namespace URI to contain non-ascii characters. - sec. 4.2 : I propose to change the reference from RFC 3986 to RFC 3987, here and in the appendix: "associated with a IRI [IETF RFC 3987].", "The identity of the policy expression as an absolute IRI [IETF RFC 3987]. ", and all occurrences of "URI with "IRI" in that section. Impact of the change: /wsp:Policy/@Name is defined in terms of xs:anyURI. As Jonathan stated for addressing in his mail, the data type IRIs maps well to xs:anyURI, so my change proposal has no effect on the data type of @Name. About /wsp:Policy/@wsu:Id , the section says: "to refer to this policy expression [identified by @wsu:Id], a URI-reference MAY be formed using this value per Section 4.2 of WS-Security [WS-Security 2004]." I would propose to say "IRI-reference". WS-Security relies on WS-Policy, which itself operates on the information set level, and not on the serialization of XML. On the info set level, there is no difference between URI and IRI. - sec 4.3.4 : About /wsp:Policy/…/wsp:PolicyReference/@URI : I propose to say "This attribute references a policy expression by an IRI" and all occurrences of URI with IRI in that paragraph. Impact of the change: see my explanation on /wsp:Policy/@Name and /wsp:Policy/@wsu:Id above. About /wsp:Policy/…/wsp:PolicyReference/@Digest and /wsp:Policy/…/wsp:PolicyReference/@DigestAlgorithm : I don't expect the use of IRIs here, so I propose no change. CHANGES IN THE ATTACHMENT DOCUMENT: sec. 3.3 XML Element Attachment : I propose to write "The wsp:PolicyURIs attribute contains a white space-separated list of one or more IRIs [IETF RFC 3987].", and change the reference in the appendix, and change all occurrences of URI to IRI in that section. impact of the change: see my explanation on /wsp:Policy/@Name and /wsp:Policy/@wsu:Id above. sec. 3.4 : I propose to change "typically using URIs." to "typically using IRIs.". sec. 5.2, 5.3 : I propose to change "URI" to "IRI". These changes have no impact, since they rely on the definition of a policy expression, which "IRIness" is given by the change in the framework document. Felix [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/9 [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/08/09-ws-policy-minutes.html#item07 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2005Feb/0171 [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Aug/0049.html
Received on Thursday, 10 August 2006 04:28:22 UTC