public-ws-policy@w3.org from August 2006 by date

Thursday, 31 August 2006

• RE: Does the selected Policy alternative apply in both directions? Abbie Barbir
• RE: Does the selected Policy alternative apply in both directions? Daniel Roth
• Re: NEW ISSUE: (3622) Policy assertion equivalence and generality Anne Anderson
• Re: Issue 3619 - input from WS-Addressing WG Marc Hadley
• RE: Does the selected Policy alternative apply in both directions? Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: Issue 3619 - input from WS-Addressing WG Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: Issue 3619 - input from WS-Addressing WG Sergey Beryozkin
• [Bug 3557] Add discussion/examples of domain expressions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: Does the selected Policy alternative apply in both directions? Abbie Barbir

Wednesday, 30 August 2006

• Does the selected Policy alternative apply in both directions? Ashok Malhotra
• RE: Issue 3557 (was ACTION 53 Yalcinalp, Umit
• Issue 3619 - input from WS-Addressing WG Paul Cotton
• RE: Issue 3557 (was ACTION 53 Ashok Malhotra
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Semantics of successful intersection determined by domain-specific assertion content Daniel Roth
• Issue 3620 is out of scope Paul Cotton
• [VER2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 08 - 2006-08-30 Christopher B Ferris
• RE: bugzilla "feature" Paul Cotton
• Re: NEW ISSUE (3638) Need to be able to specify ordering between assertions Bijan Parsia
• Re: bugzilla "feature" Felix Sasaki
• RE: Issue 3557 (was ACTION 53 Ashok Malhotra
• RE: NEW ISSUE (3638) Need to be able to specify ordering between assertions Ashok Malhotra
• Re: NEW ISSUE (3638) Need to be able to specify ordering between assertions Bijan Parsia
• RE: Issue 3557 (was ACTION 53 Asir Vedamuthu

Tuesday, 29 August 2006

• ACTION 66: PaulC and Chris to investigate how to mark/close an issue as designated for v.next Paul Cotton
• Action-28: daveo look at adding/developing versioning policy material to primer/guide David Orchard
• NEW ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Ashok Malhotra
• NEW ISSUE (3638) Need to be able to specify ordering between assertions Ashok Malhotra
• RE: Updated issue 3590 Asir Vedamuthu

Monday, 28 August 2006

• Updated issue 3590 David Orchard
• RE: Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 08 - 2006-08-30 Christopher B Ferris
• RE: Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 08 - 2006-08-30 Prasad Yendluri
• ACTION-67 and Issue 3592 William Henry
• Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 08 - 2006-08-30 Christopher B Ferris

Friday, 25 August 2006

• Re: NEW ISSUE: (3622) Policy assertion equivalence and generality Bijan Parsia
• Re: NEW ISSUE: (3622) Policy assertion equivalence and generality Fabian Ritzmann
• Re: NEW ISSUE: (3623) Relation of Attachment to SAWSDL Bijan Parsia
• RE: NEW ISSUE: (3623) Relation of Attachment to SAWSDL Paul Cotton
• NEW ISSUE: (3622) Policy assertion equivalence and generality Bijan Parsia
• NEW ISSUE: (3621) Formal semantics Bijan Parsia
• NEW ISSUE: (3623) Relation of Attachment to SAWSDL Bijan Parsia

Thursday, 24 August 2006

• Bug 3549 issue and questions, to complete action 70 Frederick Hirsch
• RE: Bug 3577 Sverdlov, Yakov

Wednesday, 23 August 2006

• Bugzilla 3613 - Framework, Compact Normalization Frederick Hirsch
• RE: 3459 Proposed change to Framework 3.1 Asir Vedamuthu
• WS-Policy reference indirection Paul Denning
• re: Bug 3577 Monica J. Martin
• [VER 2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 07 - 2006-08-23 Paul Cotton
• ACTION 35 Glen Daniels
• NEW ISSUE: Policy Attachment to WS-Addr EndpointReferences Glen Daniels
• Regrets for tomorrow's call Toufic Boubez
• 3544 - RE: Action Item 54 Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Action item 5? (Action item 2 from last week) Asir Vedamuthu

Tuesday, 22 August 2006

• RE: policy framework questions Yalcinalp, Umit
• Action Item 54 Christopher B Ferris
• Re: 3459 Proposed change to Framework 3.1 Frederick Hirsch
• RE: 3459 Proposed change to Framework 3.1 Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 07 - 2006-08-23 Ashok Malhotra
• Re: Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 07 - 2006-08-23 Fabian Ritzmann
• Re: policy framework questions Anthony Nadalin
• Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 07 - 2006-08-23 Paul Cotton

Monday, 21 August 2006

• policy framework questions Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Proposed change to Framework 3.1 Anthony Nadalin
• Re: Proposed change to Framework 3.1 Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Proposed change to Framework 3.1 Anthony Nadalin
• Re: Proposed change to Framework 3.1 Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Proposed change to Framework 3.1 Anthony Nadalin
• Proposed change to Framework 3.1 Frederick Hirsch
• RE: NEW ISSUE: WS-Policy 1.5 Attachment; Typo in section 3.3 example Asir Vedamuthu

Friday, 18 August 2006

• NEW ISSUE: Better describe policy language capabilities in the Introduction Sverdlov, Yakov

Wednesday, 16 August 2006

• RE: ACTION 53 Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: NEW ISSUE: WS-Policy 1.5 Attachment; Typo in section 3.3 example William Henry
• http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/5 Bijan Parsia
• NEW ISSUE: WS-Policy 1.5 Attachment; Typo in section 3.3 example William Henry
• NEW ISSUE 3602: The absence of an assertion should not mean that the behavior is "explicitly prohibited" Daniel Roth
• Re: Second Editors' Drafts Frederick Hirsch
• RE: New Issue: Policy framework should document extensibility points using {any} and @{any} in xpath-like expressions, and define these in Notational Conventions section Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: Action item 5? (Action item 2 from last week) Bijan Parsia
• RE: Action-45 Sverdlov, Yakov
• RE: ACTION 13 Namespace URI versioning policy Christopher B Ferris
• [VER3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 06 - 2006-08-16 Christopher B Ferris
• entering bugzilla entries Christopher B Ferris
• RE: bugzilla "feature" Christopher B Ferris
• RE: bugzilla "feature" Christopher B Ferris
• Action item 5? (Action item 2 from last week) Bijan Parsia
• RE: NEW ISSUE: The framework specification should enable usage of xml:id Asir Vedamuthu

Tuesday, 15 August 2006

• New Issue: Policy framework should document extensibility points using {any} and @{any} in xpath-like expressions, and define these in Notational Conventions section David Orchard
• RE: ACTION 13 Namespace URI versioning policy David Orchard
• RE: ACTION 53 Ashok Malhotra
• RE: ACTION 53 Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: bugzilla "feature" Paul Cotton
• Action-45 Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: bugzilla "feature" Yalcinalp, Umit
• ACTION 13 Namespace URI versioning policy Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: ACTION 53 Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: URGENT: Zakim Teleconferencing Bridge is DOWN - ETA unknown at this time Paul Cotton
• URGENT: Zakim Teleconferencing Bridge is DOWN - ETA unknown at this time Paul Cotton
• RE: bugzilla "feature" Paul Cotton
• [VER2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 06 - 2006-08-16 Christopher B Ferris
• ACTION 53 Ashok Malhotra
• RE: NEW ISSUE: The framework specification should enable usage of xml:id Yalcinalp, Umit

Monday, 14 August 2006

• RE: NEW ISSUE: The framework specification should enable usage of xml:id Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: NEW ISSUE: The framework specification should enable usage of xml:id Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 06 - 2006-08-16 Anthony Nadalin
• Second Editors' Drafts Asir Vedamuthu
• issue discussion Christopher B Ferris
• Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 06 - 2006-08-16 Christopher B Ferris
• Is that all you've got? Christopher B Ferris

Saturday, 12 August 2006

• RE: NEW ISSUE: Remove misleading reference to a Requester policy (Issue 3586) Sverdlov, Yakov

Friday, 11 August 2006

• RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all circumstances Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: NEW ISSUE: The framework specification should enable usage of xml:id Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Action item 9: "information about cascading changes" with URI -> IRI Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Bug 3556 Ashok Malhotra
• RE: Bug 3558 Ashok Malhotra
• WS-Policy issues 3590 and 3592 Paul Cotton

Thursday, 10 August 2006

• Re: Proposed resolutions to issues 3549 and 3548 Frederick Hirsch
• my regrets: 8/16 Jong Lee
• Action Item http://www.w3.org/2006/07/13-ws-policy-minutes.html#action24 Maryann Hondo
• RE: Proposed resolutions to issues 3549 and 3548 Ashok Malhotra
• Action item 9: "information about cascading changes" with URI -> IRI Felix Sasaki
• Re: Proposed resolutions to issues 3549 and 3548 Anthony Nadalin

Wednesday, 9 August 2006

• Proposed resolutions to issues 3549 and 3548 Frederick Hirsch
• maintaining issues Christopher B Ferris
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Remove misleading reference to a Requester policy (Issue 3586) Daniel Roth
• RE: regarding issue 3545 Christopher B Ferris

Tuesday, 8 August 2006

• RE: regarding issue 3545 David Orchard
• RE: 3554: "Policy Alternatives" and "Policy" need proper definiti on Prasad Yendluri
• RE: [VER 2] WS-Policy WG Teleconference 05 Agenda 2006-08-09 Paul Cotton
• RE: [VER 2] WS-Policy WG Teleconference 05 Agenda 2006-08-09 Ashok Malhotra
• RE: regarding issue 3545 Asir Vedamuthu
• [VER 2] WS-Policy WG Teleconference 05 Agenda 2006-08-09 Paul Cotton
• RE: 3553: Policy Compatibility Check must account for level of Nesting of Policy Alternatives Maryann Hondo
• Regrets for Aug 9th William Henry
• regarding issue 3545 Christopher B Ferris
• Re: ACTION-7, ACTION-9 and Issue 3561 Christopher B Ferris
• action item 7 done Christopher B Ferris
• RE: 3556 Suggested rewording of Introduction to WS-PolicyAttachment (was RE: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/13-ws-policy-minutes.html#action05 Asir Vedamuthu

Monday, 7 August 2006

• NEW ISSUE: Remove misleading reference to a Requester policy (Issue 3586) Sverdlov, Yakov
• RE: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 05 Agenda 2006-08-09 Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: ACTION-13: review of namespace change policy Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: ACTION-43: amend the minutes Asir Vedamuthu
• WS-Policy WG Teleconference 05 Agenda 2006-08-09 Paul Cotton
• ACTION-35: fomulate issue concerning how to clarify merge discussion Paul Cotton
• ACTION-33: to specify how EPRs functions as subjects Paul Cotton
• ACTION 28: adding/developing versioning policy material Paul Cotton
• ACTION-13: review of namespace change policy Paul Cotton
• ACTION-36: raise isue about 4th paragraph under figure 4-1 Paul Cotton
• ACTION-43: amend the minutes Paul Cotton
• ACTION-7, ACTION-9 and Issue 3561 Paul Cotton

Saturday, 5 August 2006

• RE: 3554: "Policy Alternatives" and "Policy" need proper def inition Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: 3553: Policy Compatibility Check must account for level of Nesting of Policy Alternatives Asir Vedamuthu

Friday, 4 August 2006

• RE: Action Item http://www.w3.org/2006/07/12-ws-policy-minutes.html#action01 Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: Action Item http://www.w3.org/2006/07/12-ws-policy-minutes.html#action01 Frederick Hirsch
• bugzilla "feature" Christopher B Ferris
• RE: NEW ISSUE: "Policy Alternatives" and "Policy" need proper def inition Yalcinalp, Umit

Thursday, 3 August 2006

• FW: www.w3.org mirrors overloaded Paul Cotton
• RE: NEW ISSUE: "Policy Alternatives" and "Policy" need proper def inition Prasad Yendluri
• RE: NEW ISSUE: "Policy Alternatives" and "Policy" need proper def inition Anthony Nadalin
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Policy Negotiation Sverdlov, Yakov

Wednesday, 2 August 2006

• Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all circumstances William Henry
• ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all circumstances Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: Optional discussion Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Policy Negotiation Ashok Malhotra
• Optional discussion William Henry
• RE: NEW ISSUE: "Policy Alternatives" and "Policy" need proper def inition Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Policy Negotiation Asir Vedamuthu
• updated actions Christopher B Ferris
• I have updated bug 3558 as requested Ashok Malhotra
• I have updated bug 3556 as requested Ashok Malhotra
• [UPDATED] Use of Bugzilla for WS-Policy Issues Christopher B Ferris
• RE: NEW ISSUE: "Policy Alternatives" and "Policy" need proper def inition Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: Action Item http://www.w3.org/2006/07/12-ws-policy-minutes.html#action01 Maryann Hondo
• [VER2] WS-Policy WG Teleconference 04 Agenda 2006-08-02 Christopher B Ferris
• Re: Action Item http://www.w3.org/2006/07/12-ws-policy-minutes.html#action01 Anthony Nadalin
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Policy Compatibility Check must account for level of Nesting of Policy Alternatives Prasad Yendluri
• Action Item http://www.w3.org/2006/07/12-ws-policy-minutes.html#action01 Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: NEW ISSUE: "Policy Alternatives" and "Policy" need proper def inition Prasad Yendluri
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Policy Compatibility Check must account for level of N esting of Policy Alternatives Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: NEW ISSUE: "Policy Alternatives" and "Policy" need proper def inition Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Policy Application to Web services Model description i naccurate Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Misc. (editorial) corrections throughout Asir Vedamuthu

Tuesday, 1 August 2006

• new issue email notification Christopher B Ferris
• Question on Policy structure William Henry
• Your Bugzilla password. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: NEW ISSUE: "Policy Alternatives" and "Policy" need proper def inition Prasad Yendluri

Last message date: Thursday, 31 August 2006 22:49:43 UTC