- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:35:48 +0000
- To: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5206 Summary: Ordering of Assertions Product: WS-Policy Version: LC Platform: All URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws- policy/2007Oct/0004.html OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Guidelines AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org ReportedBy: chrisfer@us.ibm.com QAContact: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org The Framework document says: “Assertions within an alternative are not ordered, and thus aspects such as the order in which behaviors (indicated by assertions) are applied to a subject <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#policy_subject> are beyond the scope of this specification. However, authors can write assertions that control the order in which behaviors are applied.”. This is a curious head-in-the-sand statement as it admits that the order in which assertions within an alternative are applied can be important and then refuses to address the problem.
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2007 17:36:01 UTC