- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:35:48 +0000
- To: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5206
Summary: Ordering of Assertions
Product: WS-Policy
Version: LC
Platform: All
URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-
policy/2007Oct/0004.html
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Guidelines
AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org
ReportedBy: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
QAContact: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
The Framework document says: “Assertions within an alternative are not
ordered, and thus aspects such as the order in which behaviors
(indicated by assertions) are applied to a subject
<http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#policy_subject> are
beyond the scope of this specification. However, authors can write
assertions that control the order in which behaviors are applied.”. This
is a curious head-in-the-sand statement as it admits that the order in
which assertions within an alternative are applied can be important and
then refuses to address the problem.
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2007 17:36:01 UTC