[Bug 4072] [Guidance] Statements not relevant to assertion design

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4072


chrisfer@us.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Comment #2 from chrisfer@us.ibm.com  2007-03-14 18:17 -------
[14:06] scribe: Topic: Issue 4072
[14:07] cferris:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0103.html
[14:08] cferris: relates to http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4072 
[14:08] scribe: Daniel: This proposal address the remainder of the existing
Issue.
[14:09] scribe: General text on policy references weren't relevant to assertion
design. Recognized however, best practice exists for attachments. Semantics
don't have dependency on attachment mechanism used.
[14:09] *** ArnaudM has signed off IRC (Quit: CGI:IRC (EOF)).
[14:10] scribe: Rewrote Section 4.1 and added Best Practice.
[14:10] fhirsch3: q+
[14:11] * Zakim sees fhirsch on the speaker queue
[14:12] fhirsch3: q-
[14:12] * Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue
[14:13] scribe: RESOLUTION: Issue 4072 as revised proposal in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0103.html
[14:14] cferris: rrsagent, where am i?
[14:14] RRSAgent: See http://www.w3.org/2007/03/14-ws-policy-irc#T18-14-48

Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 18:17:54 UTC