[Bug 4073] [Guidelines] Free standing statements

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4073


chrisfer@us.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Comment #1 from chrisfer@us.ibm.com  2007-03-13 23:52 -------
a) [19:34] cferris: s/Assertion Authors are defined by the WS-Policy Framework
to be a community that chooses to exploit the WS-Policy Framework by creating
their own specification to define a set of assertions that express the
capabilities and constraints of that target domain. /Assertion Authors are a
community that chooses to exploit the WS-Policy Framework by creating their own
specification to define a set of assertions that express the capabilities and
constraints of that target domain. /

b) s/Assertion Authors must also specify how to associate the assertions they
have defined with the policy subjects identified by the WS-PolicyAttachment
specification./An assertion author should also specify a policy subject. For
instance, if a policy assertion were to be used with WSDL, an assertion
description should specify a WSDL policy subject./

c) [19:40] cferris: s/When a web service provider chooses to make its
capabilities and constraints available, the provider may also need to conform
to requirements of other policy assertion specifications it utilizes ( i.e.,
WS-SecurityPolicy).// in setion 3.1.4

d) [19:42] cferris: s/Otherwise, domain specific comparison algorithms will
need to be devised and be delegated to the specific domain handlers that are
not visible to the WS-Policy framework./Otherwise, domain specific comparison
algorithms may need to be devised and be delegated to the specific domain
handlers that are not visible to the WS-Policy framework./ in section 4.4.3

e) s/capabilities, preferences and behaviors/capabilities and behaviors/

f) [19:44] cferris: in section 6.1 s/In particular, the timing of a policy
attachment or the role that a party who attaches policy should have no bearing
on the evaluation of the policy assertion//

g) [19:48] cferris: in section 7 s/The policy framework only defines an
algorithm for calculating effective policies for WSDL 1.1 based subjects./The
WS-Policy 1.5 - Attachment specification defines algorithms for calculating the 
 effective policy for a given policy subject and effective policies for
 WSDL 1.1, WSDL 2.0 and UDDI policy subjects./

[19:51] cferris: RESOLUTION: Issue 4073 closed with resolution recorded in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0093.html
[19:51] dmoberg: Time now 4:52 PM PDT.
[19:51] cferris: rrsagent, where am i?
[19:51] RRSAgent: See http://www.w3.org/2007/03/13-ws-policy-irc#T23-52-22-1

Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2007 23:52:50 UTC