[Bug 4584] Clarify how lax mode and ignorable assertions affect the intersection algorithm

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4584


chrisfer@us.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
          Component|Primer                      |Framework
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
            Version|FPWD                        |CR




------- Comment #2 from chrisfer@us.ibm.com  2007-06-06 17:33 -------
[13:30] cferris: 1. •
 Modify Section 3.1, Framework - S/An ignorable policy assertion is an
assertion that may be ignored for policy intersection/An ignorable policy
assertion is an assertion that may be ignored for purposes of determining the
compatibility of alternatives in policy intersection in lax mode/
[13:30] monica: c/on/using
[13:30] monica: ok in 
[13:30] cferris: 2. •
 Add to Section 4.5, Framework – “The behavior implied by an ignorable
assertion is expected to be a behavior that need not be engaged for successful
interoperation with the entity that includes such ignorable assertions in its
policy.”
[13:30] cferris: 3. S/If two alternatives are compatible, their intersection is
an alternative containing all of the assertions in both alternatives/If two
alternatives are compatible, their intersection is an alternative containing
all of the assertions in both alternatives, regardless of whether or not they
are marked with the wsp:Ignorable='true' attribute.
[13:31] asir: RESOLUTION: closed issue 4584 with the changes 1-3 above
[13:31] cferris: rrsagent, where am i?
[13:31] RRSAgent: See http://www.w3.org/2007/06/06-ws-policy-irc#T17-33-13

Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2007 17:33:42 UTC