- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:00:57 +0000
- To: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4861 chrisfer@us.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Comment #1 from chrisfer@us.ibm.com 2007-07-18 15:00 ------- RESOLUTION: issue 4861 closed with proposal from Chris in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jul/0038.html replacing the last paragraph with the following: If the assertion author had not provided for the wsp:Optional attribute to be included on the assertion, then policy expression authors would be forced to express the optionality of a behavior as two explicit policy alternatives, one with and one without that assertion when including assertions of that type in their policies. and replacing the foo:Bar assertion with a real assertion such as wsrmp:RMAssertion See http://www.w3.org/2007/07/18-ws-policy-irc#T15-00-11
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2007 15:01:06 UTC