[Bug 4660] [Guidelines] Best Practice Statments should be statements

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4660


chrisfer@us.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Comment #1 from chrisfer@us.ibm.com  2007-07-18 11:14 -------
[06:44] dorchard: #1: good
[06:46] dorchard: #2: "make behaviours relevent to compatibility tests"...
[06:46] fsasaki: s/relevent/relevant/
[06:47] dorchard: chrisf "define assertions relevent to compatibility tests"
[06:47] dorchard: #2: Define assertions relevent to compatibilty tests
[06:48] * Fabian likes revelant :-)
[06:48] dorchard: #3: as-is
[06:48] dorchard: #2: Define assertions relevant to compatibility tests
[06:48] dorchard: #4: as-is
[06:48] dorchard: #5: as-is
[06:49] dorchard: #6: open issue
[06:49] dorchard: #7: as-is
[06:49] dorchard: #8: see above
[06:50] dorchard: #9: document use of the ignorable attribute
[06:50] dorchard: #10: define message format only
[06:51] dorchard: #11: as-is\
[06:51] *** FrederickHirsch has joined #ws-policy.
[06:51] *** fjh has signed off IRC (Quit: CGI:IRC (EOF)).
[06:51] dorchard: #12: as-is
[06:52] dorchard: #13: as-is
[06:52] dorchard: #14: as-is
[06:52] dorchard: #15: as-is
[06:53] dorchard: #16: Allow use of wsp:Optional
[06:53] dorchard: #17 may go away, part 4861
[06:54] dorchard: #18 also related to 4861
[06:54] dorchard: #19 also related 4861
[06:54] dorchard: #20 also related to 4861
[06:55] dorchard: #21: as-is
[06:55] dorchard: #22: as-is
[06:56] dorchard: #23: n/a, no change now
[06:56] dorchard: #24: Specify Preferred Attachment Point
[06:58] dorchard: #25: Semantics of Multiple Instances of Same Type
[06:58] Zakim: -Abbie_Barbir
[07:00] * fsasaki zakim, who is here?
[07:00] * Zakim sees on the phone: Iona
[07:00] * Zakim sees on irc: FrederickHirsch, monica, maryann, SergeyB, Ashok,
TomR, charlton, pbc, asir, abbie, ArnaudM, dorchard, cferris, Fabian, RRSAgent,
Zakim, dmoberg, fsasaki, trackbot
[07:01] dorchard: #25: as-is
[07:02] dorchard: #26: as-is
[07:02] dorchard: #27: Independent Assertions for Different Versions of a
Behavior
[07:03] dorchard: #28: document changes to policy subject
[07:05] dorchard: paulc: don't want to lose the question about whether we are
talking just about assertion authors or also assertion "users"
[07:07] dorchard: paulc: bp on how to write an individual assertion, and bp
about non specific assertion things that an assertion author should do.
[07:07] cferris: best practives for assertion authors and best practices for
assertions
[07:08] dorchard: and no best practices for policy expression authors
[07:09] cferris: ACTION: Maryann to draft proposal to provide list of BPs that
relate to assertion authors specifically
[07:09] * trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it.
[07:09] * RRSAgent records action 3
[07:09] trackbot: Created ACTION-337 - Draft proposal to provide list of BPs
that relate to assertion authors specifically [on Maryann Hondo - due
2007-07-25].
[07:09] dorchard: audiences are: assertion authors, assertions, policy
expression authors
[07:11] dorchard: I give up.
[07:11] * asir .. the problem is .. you are stateless :-)
[07:12] * dorchard what did you say?
[07:12] * dorchard who am i?
[07:12] * dorchard what am I doing here?
[07:12] cferris: RESOLUTION: issue 4660 closed with IRC documented changes to
the BPs above
[07:12] cferris: rrsagent, where am i?
[07:12] * asir sounds like that movie, '50 dates
[07:12] RRSAgent: See http://www.w3.org/2007/07/18-ws-policy-irc#T11-14-17

Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2007 11:14:56 UTC